Early version in chemistry with a solution. Changes in the demonstration versions of the exam in chemistry

Each version of the USE in Chemistry 2015 consists of two parts, including 40 tasks. Part 1 contains 35 tasks with a short answer, including 26 tasks of a basic level of complexity, the serial numbers of these tasks: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 26, (former A part) and 9 tasks of an increased level of complexity, the serial numbers of these tasks : 27, 28, 29, ... 35 (former B part). The answer to each task is written briefly in the form of one digit or a sequence of digits (three or four). The sequence of numbers is written in the answer sheet without spaces and separating characters.

Part 2 contains 5 tasks of a high level of complexity with a detailed answer (former C part). The sequence numbers of these tasks are: 36, 37, 38, 39, 40. Answers to tasks 36–40 include a detailed description of the entire progress of the task. In the answer sheet No. 2, indicate the number of the task and write down its full solution.

3 hours (180 minutes) are allotted to complete the examination paper in chemistry.
All USE forms are filled in with bright black ink. The use of gel, capillary or fountain pens is allowed. When completing assignments, you can use a draft. Draft entries do not count towards the assessment of the work.
When doing work on the exam in chemistry, you can use the Periodic system of chemical elements of D.I. Mendeleev; table of solubility of salts, acids and bases in water; electrochemical series of voltages of metals.
These accompanying materials are attached to the text of the work. Use a non-programmable calculator for calculations.

Changes in KIM in chemistry in 2015 compared to 2014

In the work of 2015 compared to 2014, the following changes were adopted.

1. The structure of the KIM variant has been changed: each variant consists of two parts and includes 40 tasks (instead of 42 tasks in 2014), differing in form and level of complexity. Tasks in the variant are presented in continuous numbering mode.

2. The number of tasks of the basic level of complexity has been reduced from 28 to 26 tasks. We combined the former A2 and A3 into task No. 2, A 22 and A23 into task No. 21.
3. The form of recording the answer to each of the tasks 1–26 has been changed: in KIM 2015, it is required to write down the number corresponding to the number of the correct answer.
4. The maximum score for completing all tasks of the 2015 examination paper is 64 (instead of 65 points in 2014).
5. The scale for assessing the task for finding the molecular formula of a substance has been changed. The maximum score for its implementation is 4 (instead of 3 points in 2014). The task has become a little more complicated - it is necessary not only to establish the molecular formula of the original organic substance, but also to draw up a structural formula of this substance, which unambiguously reflects the order of bonding of atoms in its molecule, and write an additional equation for the reaction of this substance, specified in the condition of the problem.

Demonstration options for the exam in chemistry for grade 11 consist of two parts. The first part includes tasks to which you need to give a short answer. To the tasks from the second part it is necessary to give a detailed answer.

All demonstration versions of the exam in chemistry contain correct answers to all tasks and assessment criteria for tasks with a detailed answer.

There are no changes compared to.

Demonstration options for the exam in chemistry

Note that chemistry demos are presented in pdf format, and to view them you need to have installed, for example, the freely distributed software package Adobe Reader on your computer.

Changes in the demonstration versions of the exam in chemistry

Demonstration versions of the exam in chemistry for grade 11 for 2002 - 2014 consisted of three parts. The first part included tasks in which you need to choose one of the proposed answers. The tasks from the second part were required to give a short answer. To the tasks from the third part it was necessary to give a detailed answer.

In 2014 in demonstration version of the exam in chemistry the following changes:

• all calculation tasks, the performance of which was estimated at 1 point, were placed in part 1 of the work (A26-A28),
• subject "Redox Reactions" tested with assignments IN 2 and C1;
• subject "Hydrolysis of salts" checked only with the task AT 4;
• a new task has been included(in position AT 6) to check the topics "qualitative reactions to inorganic substances and ions", "qualitative reactions of organic compounds"
• total number of jobs in each variant was 42 (instead of 43 in the work of 2013).

In 2015, there were fundamental changes have been made:

Option became be in two parts(part 1 - short answer questions, part 2 - open-ended questions).

Numbering assignments has become through throughout the variant without letter designations A, B, C.

Was the form of recording the answer in tasks with a choice of answers has been changed: the answer has become necessary to write down the number with the number of the correct answer (and not mark with a cross).

It was the number of tasks of the basic level of complexity has been reduced from 28 to 26 tasks.

Maximum score for completing all the tasks of the examination paper in 2015 became 64 (instead of 65 points in 2014).

• The grading system has been changed. tasks for finding the molecular formula of a substance. The maximum score for its implementation - 4 (instead of 3 points in 2014).

AT 2016 year in demo in chemistrysignificant changes have been made compared to the previous year 2015 :

Part 1 changed the format of tasks 6, 11, 18, 24, 25 and 26 basic level of difficulty with a short answer.

Changed the format of tasks 34 and 35 increased level of complexity : these tasks now require you to match instead of selecting multiple correct answers from a suggested list.

The distribution of tasks by difficulty level and types of skills being tested has been changed.

In 2017 compared to demo version of 2016 in chemistrythere have been significant changes. The structure of the examination paper has been optimized:

Was changed the structure of the first part demo version: tasks with a choice of one answer were excluded from it; tasks were grouped into separate thematic blocks, each of which began to contain tasks of both basic and advanced levels of complexity.

It was reduced the total number of tasks up to 34.

Was grading scale changed(from 1 to 2 points) completing tasks of the basic level of complexity, which test the assimilation of knowledge about the genetic relationship of inorganic and organic substances (9 and 17).

Maximum score for the completion of all tasks of the examination paper was reduced to 60 points.

In 2018 in demo version of the exam in chemistry compared with demo version of 2017 in chemistry the following changes:

It was task 30 added high level of complexity with a detailed answer,

Maximum score for the completion of all tasks of the examination work remained without change by changing the scale for grading tasks in part 1.

AT demo version of the USE 2019 in chemistry compared with demo version of 2018 in chemistry there were no changes.

On our website you can also get acquainted with the training materials prepared by the teachers of our training center "Resolventa" for preparing for the exam in mathematics.

For students in grades 10 and 11 who want to prepare well and pass USE in mathematics or Russian language for a high score, the training center "Resolventa" conducts

We also have organized for schoolchildren

The season of state exams in Russian schools has started. From March 23 to May 7, early exams are held, and from May 25, the Unified State Examination in the Russian language opens the main wave, which will end with reserve retakes on June 26. Further - obtaining certificates, graduation balls, admission to a university!

KIM early exam in chemistry for review can be downloaded. I will post answers and solutions to this option soon.

Some results of the early exam in chemistry, which took place on April 4, 2015, can be summed up now. Examples of assignments with a written response received from colleagues and students who took exams:

Task 36.
1) KJ+KJO 3 +…=…+K 2 SO 4 +H 2 O
2) Fe(OH)3+…+Br2=K2FeO4+…+H2O
3) Cr(OH)3+J2+…=K2CrO4+…+H2O

Decision:

1) Based on the fact that potassium sulfate is formed on the right side, we add sulfuric acid on the left side. The oxidizing agent in this reaction is potassium iodate, and the reducing agent is potassium iodide. This reaction is an example of counter-disproportionation, when both atoms - both the oxidizing agent (J + 5) and the reducing agent (J -), pass into one atom - iodine with an oxidation state of 0.

5KJ + KJO 3 + 3H 2 SO 4 = 3I 2 + 3K 2 SO 4 + 3H 2 O

2J — — 2e = J 2 0

2J 5+ +10e = J 2 0

Oxidizing agent - KJO 3 (J +5)

Reducing agent - KJ (J -).

2) Bromine in an alkaline medium is very strong. Since on the right side is formed salt iron +6, the reaction medium is alkaline, on the left we add alkali - potassium hydroxide. Since bromine is an oxidizing agent in this reaction, it is reduced to an oxidation state of -1, and in an alkaline medium it is recorded as a salt - potassium bromide.

2Fe(OH) 3 + 10KOH + 3Br 2 = 2K 2 FeO 4 + 6KBr + 8H 2 O

Fe 3+ - 3e \u003d Fe 6+

Br 2 + 2e \u003d 2Br -

Oxidizing agent - Br 2 (Br 2)

The reducing agent is Fe (OH) 3 (Fe 3+).

3) According to the product on the right side - potassium chromate - we determine the alkaline medium in which the reaction is carried out, i.e. add alkali on the left - potassium hydroxide KOH. The oxidizing agent is molecular iodine in an alkaline medium, therefore, it is reduced to iodide ion and written as a salt KI:

2Cr(OH) 3 + 3J 2 + 10KOH=2K 2 CrO 4 + 6KI + 8H 2 O

Cr +3 - 3e = Cr +6

J 2 + 2e \u003d 2J -

Oxidizing agent - J 2

Reducing agent - Cr (OH) 3 (Cr +3).

Task 37. A solution of copper nitrate was subjected to electrolysis. The substance formed at the cathode reacted with CuO. The resulting substance was treated with concentrated sulfuric acid. A gas with a pungent odor was released. Sodium sulfide solution was added to this solution, and a black precipitate formed.

Task 38.

Let's take a closer look at the complex oxidation reaction of an aromatic hydrocarbon with an unsaturated alkyl substituent. Indeed, the reaction is ambiguous, and in the course of the reaction, most likely, a mixture of various oxidation products of organic matter is formed. I’ll make a reservation right away that everything that is written below refers to the exam and the interpretation of this oxidation in the exam.

So, why does oxidation occur with the rupture of sigma and pi bonds? Because oxidation with a break of only pi-bonds (Wagner reaction) in the exam is drawn up as follows:

The oxidation of unsaturated hydrocarbons in an aqueous medium and when heated proceeds with the breaking of sigma and pi bonds (double bond). At the same time, we also know that the oxidation of benzene homologues produces benzoic acid (in an acidic environment) or metal benzoate (in a neutral environment). When permanagnate is reduced, an alkali is formed. The resulting alkali will neutralize the reaction products. How much it will neutralize them is a matter of stoichiometric ratios, i.e. the question of electronic balance, and it is possible to answer the question about the composition and quantity of the products of the oxidation reaction of complex organic molecules only in the process of compiling the balance.

In this case, the oxidation will most likely proceed according to the following mechanism: potassium benzoate is formed and the C-C bonds marked in the figure are broken. The detached carbon atoms are oxidized to carbon dioxide)

The following fragments from textbooks serve as proof of the correctness of this assumption:

Chemistry. Grade 10. profile level. Kuzmenko, Eremin. 2012, p. 421.

Organic chemistry. Traven V.F., Volume 1, 2004, p. 474:

So, we have decided on the products, now we are drawing up a reaction scheme:

Electronic balance:

Having received the balance coefficients, we arrange them and equalize in order - balance coefficients, metal atoms, non-metal atoms, hydrogen, oxygen:

The reaction products - carbon dioxide and potassium hydroxide - interact with each other. Since the alkali is in excess, 6 molecules of potassium carbonate are formed and 1 molecule of unreacted potassium hydroxide remains.

Thank you very much, colleagues and readers, for your questions. I will be happy to answer new questions and comments on the materials.

Task 39. 2.3 g of sodium was dissolved in 100 ml of water. 100 ml of 30% nitric acid (p=1.18 g/ml) was added to the resulting solution. Find the mass fraction of salt in the final solution.

Task 40. When burning 20 g of acyclic organic matter, 66 g of carbon dioxide and 18 ml of water were formed. This substance reacts with an ammonia solution of silver oxide, 1 mol of this substance can attach only 1 mol of water. Determine the formula and write the reaction with an ammonia solution of silver oxide.

Documents are presented that regulate the structure and content of the control measuring materials for the unified state exam in chemistry in 2015: the codifier of the content elements and requirements for the level of training of graduates of educational institutions for the unified state exam in 2015; specification of control measuring materials for the unified state examination in 2015; demonstration version of the control measuring materials of the unified state exam in 2015. Document in PDF format.

General changes in KIM USE 2015:

1. The structure of the KIM variant has been changed: each variant consists of two parts (part 1 - tasks with a short answer, part 2 - tasks with a detailed answer).

2. Tasks in the CMM variant are presented in continuous numbering mode without letter designations A, B, C.

3. The form of writing the answer in tasks with a choice of one answer has been changed: as in tasks with a short answer, the number of the correct answer is written as a number (not a cross).

4. For most subjects, the number of tasks with a choice of one answer has been reduced.

5. Based on the analysis of statistical data on the results of the exam and the quality of CIM in a number of subjects, some lines of tasks were excluded, the form of a number of tasks was changed.

6. On an ongoing basis, work is underway to improve the criteria for evaluating tasks with a detailed answer.

There are no fundamental changes in the planned KIM USE 2014 in chemistry.

1. The number of tasks of the basic level of complexity has been reduced from 28 to 26 tasks.

2. The form of recording the answer to each of the tasks 1-26 has been changed: in KIM 2015, it is required to write down the number corresponding to the number of the correct answer.

3. The maximum score for completing all tasks of the 2015 examination paper is 64 (instead of 65 points in 2014).

4. The system for evaluating the task for finding the molecular formula of a substance has been changed. The maximum score for its implementation is 4 (instead of 3 points in 2014).

Download:

On the topic: methodological developments, presentations and notes

Features of the USE and GIA in chemistry in 2014

According to the project, some changes may be made to the KIM USE and GIA in chemistry in 2014. The presentation shows the differences in the structure of the KIM USE and GIA in chemistry compared to 2013....

USE in Biology in 2015

Biology is the fourth most popular subject. It is chosen annually by about 20% of students. Notably, more than 80% of those who choose biology typically score over 40 on the exam. Also t...

In 2015, 11% of all examinees (75,600 people) passed the exam in chemistry.

507 people received 100 points.

12.8% of graduates did not score the minimum number of points, which is five times more than in the previous one. Still, it is surprising how, with such poor knowledge, they chose chemistry for the exam, and even more so, apparently, they were going to study it at the university!

With the basic level, as shown by the results of the exam, the graduates coped relatively well. Even the poorly prepared category of children demonstrated the presence of general knowledge of these topics. We can say that the elementary foundations of chemistry have been mastered: both the periodic system of elements of D.I. Mendeleev, and the structure of the atom, and the classification of chemical reactions, the compilation of simple chemical equations.

Schoolchildren know how the properties of elements and their compounds change depending on the position in the periodic system of chemical elements of D.I. Mendeleev. Moreover, these tasks did not require a detailed answer - a simple choice and recording the number of the correct answer.

But the majority of graduates did not demonstrate a deep understanding of the dependence of the course of a chemical reaction on the chemical properties of interacting substances.

The tasks of the advanced level turned out to be practically impossible even for well-prepared participants. Perhaps because such tasks came as a surprise to them, they did not prepare for them.

Particularly difficult was the task of establishing the molecular formula of an organic substance and writing it down, as well as writing down the molecular formula of the original substance,

The topic “Interrelation of different classes of inorganic substances” is also difficult for graduates. Only a few were able to fully describe the successive series of chemical transformations of a substance that reacts with other substances. Basically, they either didn’t even take on this task, or wrote one or two first reactions.

In the "Organic Chemistry" section, difficulties arose with how to identify the indicated substance from a number of proposed ones, since they do not know which substances react with each other (for example, which of the proposed reagents should be taken to determine that the available chemical substance - acetic acid).

The tasks of the block "Methods of cognition of substances and chemical reactions" showed good results, including calculations on chemical equations.

However, complex complex tasks (numbers 39 and 40), which require knowledge of the interaction of substances and the recording of a sequential chain of equations with subsequent calculations, puzzled the graduates.

For both poorly prepared graduates and strong ones, the task of industrial production of a substance (for example, ammonia, menthol, sulfuric acid) caused difficulty. As well as finding a correspondence (for example, between the interacting substances indicated in two columns).

What conclusions arise from the results of the USE in chemistry in 2015?

First of all, it is more critical to the choice of a subject for passing the exam. If knowledge is weak, then it is probably more reasonable to help the child find an educational institution to continue his education that does not require high scores in chemistry.

If you still stopped at the exam in this difficult subject, then you need to gather all the willpower, finances and begin systematic, targeted training.

The study of theory should go in parallel with the solution of many tests on the passed part of the subject, variants of the Unified State Examination of past years, and a demo version of the exam.

Each element of the table of D. I. Mendeleev should become dear and beloved for the child. He must be able at any time of the day or night to tell the characteristics of any element, its features, the ability to interact with other substances and which ones; it is great to reflect this in formulas and equations and be able to do calculations on them.

Before starting targeted preparation for the successful passing of the exam in chemistry, it is necessary to study the recommendations given in the following documents: Specification of control and measuring materials, Codifier of content elements and requirements for the level of training, Guidelines for teachers prepared on the basis of an analysis of typical mistakes of USE participants in 2015 according to chemistry (and you can also study a similar document for past years for safety reasons). And be guided by them when preparing. All of these documents can be found on the FIPI website.