Signs of absolute truth. True

Cognition, truth and its criteria.

Option 1

Cognition- this is a process of human activity, the main content of which is the reflection of objective reality in his mind, and the result is the acquisition of new knowledge about the world around him.

Types of knowledge:

    Ordinary

  • philosophical

    artistic

    Social

In the learning process involved:

    Subject of knowledge- this is a knowing person, endowed with will and consciousness; the whole society.

    Object of knowledge is a cognizable object; the whole world around.

Stages of knowledge:

    sensuous(sensitive ) knowledge. A person receives information through the senses.

1.1 Feeling- reflection of individual properties and qualities of objects of the surrounding world that directly affect the senses;

1.2 Perception- the formation of a holistic image, with the help of objects and their properties that directly affect the senses;

1.3 Performance- such a form of cognition in which the sensory reflection (sensory image) of objects and phenomena is stored in the mind, which allows you to reproduce it mentally even if it is absent and does not affect the organs.

2. rational cognition(through thinking)

2.1 concept is a form (kind) of thought that reflects the general and essential features of cognizable objects or phenomena.

2.2 Judgment - there is a form of thought in which a connection is established between separate concepts and with the help of this connection something is affirmed or denied.

2.3 Inference called obtaining new judgments on the basis of existing ones by using the laws of logical thinking.

The essence of the process of cognition is to obtain the most objective, complete and accurate knowledge about the surrounding world. Different schools of philosophy gave different answers to the question of the possibility of knowing the world and obtaining true knowledge. Agnoses believed that it was impossible to obtain reliable knowledge , empiricists- that this can be done only with the help of sensations, and rationalists argued that the criterion of truth is only reason.

True- this is the correspondence of the acquired knowledge to the content of the object of knowledge.

The hallmark of truth is:

    objective side shows us the truth in that part of it, the content of which does not depend on us, since it exists in objective reality.

    Subjective side points to the fact that in its form the truth is always subjective, since when it is received in the process of cognition, the interaction of the object and the subject of cognition takes place, in which the consciousness of the latter takes a direct part

True:

    Absolute Truth is a complete, unchanging, once and for all established knowledge about any object or phenomenon.

    Relative truth - is an incomplete, limited knowledge, true only in certain conditions, which a person (humanity) possesses at a given stage of his development.

driving force process of cognition, as well as the criterion of truth is practice. In addition to practice, there are and other criteria of truth, in particular formal - logical , which is used when there is no way to rely on practice

Option 2

To orient a person in the surrounding world, to interpret and predict events, to plan and implement the activities of groups of people, to develop new scientific ideas, knowledge is needed. Knowledge is a complex dynamic system, it reflects the cultural experience and information potential of mankind, which is formed in the process of cognition.

Distinguish between sensory and rational cognition. Sensual knowledge of the world by a person is carried out through sensation, perception and representation. Rational knowledge (the process of thinking) involves the production of concepts, judgments, conclusions through such mental operations as comparison, assimilation, generalization, abstraction.

The question of the priority of one or another species in the knowledge of the world remains open. Philosophers who give preference to sensory knowledge, believing that it is the main and even the only source of our knowledge, are called empiricists. The opposite point of view is defended by rationalists.

At present, the thesis about the unity, interdependence and interdependence of sensory cognition (empirical experience) and conceptual, rational-logical thinking prevails in philosophy. Philosophers refuse to consider "sensibility" and "rationality" as some absolutely independent, isolated functions of a cognizing person, believing that in real cognition they are in continuous interaction. The knowledge acquired by a person in the process of cognizing the surrounding reality must be in a certain correspondence with this reality, reality. Such a problem of the correspondence of knowledge to objective reality appears in philosophy as the problem of truth. Thus, the question of what is truth is essentially a question related to establishing and verifying the correspondence of knowledge to objective reality.

In the history of philosophy, various approaches have been expressed to the selection of criteria for truth. From Plato's point of view, only knowledge of eternal and unchanging ideas can be true. F. Bacon believed that truth is the daughter of time. T. Hobbes proposed a formula: truth is the daughter of reason. Dialectical materialism regards practice as the criterion of truth.

The content of our ideas and knowledge, which does not depend on either man or mankind, is called objective truth. The form of expression of objective truth, which depends on specific historical conditions, characterizing the degree of its accuracy, rigor and completeness, which is achieved at a given level of knowledge, is called relative truth. Perfect, complete, accurate, comprehensive and exhaustive knowledge about any phenomenon or object is called absolute truth.

Option 3

Cognition can be defined as a process of human activity, the main content of which is the reflection of objective reality in his mind, and the result is the acquisition of new knowledge about the world around him. Scientists distinguish the following types of knowledge: everyday, scientific, philosophical, artistic, social. None of these types of cognitive activity is isolated from the others, they are all closely interconnected. In the process of cognition, there are always two sides: the subject of cognition and the object of cognition. In a narrow sense, the subject of cognition usually means a cognizing person endowed with will and consciousness, in a broad sense - the whole society. The object of cognition, respectively, is either a cognizable object, or, in a broad sense, the entire surrounding world within the boundaries in which individuals and society as a whole interact with it. There are two stages of cognitive activity. At the first stage, which is called sensual (sensitive) cognition (from German sensitw - perceived by the senses), a person receives information about objects and phenomena of the surrounding world with the help of the senses. The three main forms of sensory cognition are: a) sensation, which is a reflection of individual properties and qualities of objects in the surrounding world that directly affect the senses; b) perception, during which a holistic image is formed in the subject of cognition, reflecting objects and their properties that directly affect the senses; c) representation - such a form of cognition in which the sensory reflection (sensory image) of objects and phenomena is preserved in the mind, which allows it to be reproduced mentally even if it is absent and does not affect the senses. The second stage of cognitive activity is rational knowledge (from Latin ratio - mind). At this stage, relying on the data obtained as a result of the direct interaction of a person with the surrounding worldsm, with the help of thinking, their ordering is carried out and an attempt is made to comprehend the essence of cognizable objects and phenomena. Rational knowledge is carried out in the form of concepts, judgments and conclusions. The concept is a form (kind) of thought that reflects the general and essential features of cognizable objects or phenomena. Judgment is a form of thought in which a connection is established between separate concepts and with the help of this connection something is affirmed or denied. Inference is called obtaining new judgments on the basis of existing ones by using the laws of logical thinking. Rational cognition is closely connected with the reflected reality, that is, with sensory cognition, which serves as the basis for it. However, unlike sensory cognition, which exists in the form of images, the results of rational cognition are fixed in the form of signs or in language. Thus, human thinking, based on sensory experience, by means of comparison, assimilation, generalization, abstraction, transforms the sensory image, and fixes the results of the transformation in sign form. The essence of the process of cognition is to obtain the most objective, complete and accurate knowledge about the surrounding world. Different schools of philosophy gave different answers to the question of the possibility of knowing the world and obtaining true knowledge. Agnostics believed that it was impossible to obtain reliable knowledge, empiricists - that this can be done only with the help of sensations, and rationalists argued that only reason is the criterion of truth. In the history of philosophy, there have been various definitions of the concept of "truth". The most frequently used is the following: truth is the correspondence of the acquired knowledge to the content of the object of knowledge. A characteristic feature of truth is the presence of an objective and subjective side in it. The objective side shows us the truth in that part of it, the content of which does not depend on us, since it exists in objective reality. The subjective side points to the fact that in its form the truth is always subjective, since when it is received in the process of cognition, the interaction of the object and the subject of cognition takes place, in which the consciousness of the latter takes a direct part. It is customary to single out absolute truth and relative truth. Absolute truth is called complete, unchanging, once and for all established knowledge about any subject or phenomenon. However, in reality, this is practically unattainable. In most cases, we are dealing with relative truth (or truths), which is incomplete, limited knowledge, true only under certain conditions, which a person (humanity) possesses at a given stage of its development. The driving force of the process of cognition, as well as the criterion of truth, is practice. Moreover, this or that type of cognition has as a criterion of truth the form of practice corresponding to it: everyday practice, observation, experiment, etc. opportunities to rely on practice (for example, identifying logical contradictions in mathematical reasoning).

In philosophy, there are several basic concepts, among which it is worth highlighting, first of all, the definitions of the absolute itself, as well as the relative. Turning to dictionaries and reference books, we can single out the most capacious definition, which is the following concept: truth is a proven statement that is accepted as true; compliance with reality. What are examples of relative truth?

What is truth

This is primarily a process that is characterized by the perception or awareness of an object or phenomenon to the full extent. Some people tend to argue that it does not exist in principle - there is only the surrounding reality, objects, views, judgments or phenomena. Nevertheless, it is one, but in its environment some key aspects can be distinguished:

  • Relative.
  • Objective.
  • Absolute.

Of course, the development of any science involves the achievement of an absolute ideal, the truth, but this is unlikely, since each new discovery provokes even more questions and disputes. Thus, for example, a statement like "gold is a metal" is true only if gold is indeed a metal.

What is absolute truth

To begin with, it is worth defining the concept of objective truth, which is expressed as follows - the understanding and perception of knowledge, which does not depend on any particular person, group of people, civilization and society. What is the main difference between absolute truth and relative or objective truth?

Absolute is:

  • Exhaustive, fully verified, knowledge about a person, object, object or phenomenon that cannot be refuted in any way.
  • Adequate and conscious reproduction by the subject of a certain object, representation of the subject as it actually exists, regardless of the opinion of the person and his consciousness.
  • The definition of the infinity of our knowledge, a kind of limit towards which all mankind aspires.

Many argue that there is no such thing as absolute truth. Proponents of this view are inclined to believe that everything is relative, as such, there simply cannot be actual reality. Nevertheless, some examples of absolute truth can be given: scientific laws or the facts of the birth of people.

What is Relative Truth

Examples of relative truth eloquently characterize the definition of the concept itself. So, in ancient times, people believed that the atom is indivisible, in the 20th century, scientists were inclined to believe that the atom consists of electrons, and now researchers know for sure that the atom consists of a huge number of tiny particles and their number is constantly increasing. All create an eloquent idea of ​​the relativity of the real.

Based on this, we can draw conclusions about what actually represents relative truth:

  • This is knowledge (definition), which fully corresponds to a certain level of human development, but differs by not entirely verified facts or evidence.
  • The designation of the boundary or final moments of human cognition of the world, the proximity of knowledge about the surrounding reality.
  • A statement or knowledge that depends on certain conditions (time, historical events, place, and other circumstances).

Relative Truth Examples

Does absolute truth have a right to exist? To answer this question, consider a very simple example. So, the expression "the planet Earth has the shape of a geoid" can be quite attributed to statements from the category of absolute truth. After all, our planet actually has such a shape. The question is different - is this expression knowledge? Can this statement give an unknowing person an idea of ​​the shape of the planet? Most likely not. It is much more effective to imagine the Earth in the form of a ball or an ellipsoid. Thus, examples of relative truth allow us to identify the main criteria and characteristics of the most important components of philosophical concepts.

Criteria

How to distinguish absolute or relative truth from error or fiction.

Respond to the laws of logic? What is the determining factor? For these purposes, there are special concepts that allow you to determine the plausibility of a particular statement. So, the criterion of truth is that which allows you to certify the truth, to distinguish it from error, to reveal where the truth is and where the fiction is. Criteria are internal and external. What requirements must they meet?

  • Express in a simple and concise manner.
  • Comply with fundamental laws.
  • be applicable in practice.
  • comply with scientific laws.

First of all, it is practice - human activity aimed at transforming the surrounding reality.

The modern concept and its key aspects

Absolute, relative, objective truth are concepts that have clear differences from each other. In the modern definition of truth, scientists invest the following aspects: spiritual and subjective reality, the result of cognition, as well as truth as a cognitive process.

The specificity of truth deserves special attention - it cannot be abstract. Truth is always related to some time and place. the pursuit of the ideal and the search for truth will always excite philosophers and scientists. Humanity should strive for knowledge and improvement.

Social science. Full course of preparation for the Unified State Examination Shemakhanova Irina Albertovna

1.4. The concept of truth, its criteria

Epistemology - a philosophical science that studies the problems of the nature of knowledge and its possibilities. Agnosticism- a philosophical doctrine that denies, in whole or in part, the possibility of knowing the world. Gnosticism- a philosophical doctrine that recognizes the possibility of knowing the world.

Cognition- 1) the process of comprehending reality, accumulating and comprehending data obtained in the experience of human interaction with the outside world; 2) the process of active reflection and reproduction of reality in the human mind, the result of which is new knowledge about the world.

Subject of knowledge- the carrier of object-practical activity and cognition (an individual or a social group), a source of activity directed at an object; creative principle active in cognition.

Object of knowledge- that which opposes the subject in his cognitive activity. The subject itself can also act as an object (man is the object of study of many sciences: biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, philosophy, etc.).

Hierarchy of human cognitive abilities (Plato, Aristotle, I. Kant): a) sense cognition- is basic, all our knowledge begins with it; b) rational knowledge- carried out with the help of reason, able to establish, discover objective relationships (causal) between phenomena, the laws of nature; in) knowledge based on the ideas of reason- sets worldview principles.

Empiricism- a direction in the theory of knowledge, recognizing sensory experience as the only source of reliable knowledge (was formed in the XVII-XVIII centuries - R. Bacon, T. Hobbes, D. Locke).

Sensationalism - a direction in the theory of knowledge, according to which sensations and perceptions are the basis and main form of reliable knowledge.

Rationalism - a philosophical direction that recognizes the mind as the basis of knowledge and behavior of people ( R. Descartes, B. Spinoza, G. W. Leibniz).

Forms (sources, steps) of knowledge:

1. Sensory (empirical) knowledge- cognition through the senses (sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch). Features of sensory cognition: immediacy; visibility and objectivity; reproduction of external properties and sides.

Forms of sensory cognition: sensation (reflection of individual properties of an object, phenomenon, process resulting from their direct impact on the sense organs); perception (a sensual image of a holistic picture of an object, process, phenomenon that directly affects the senses); representation (a sensual image of objects and phenomena, stored in the mind without their direct impact on the senses. Through the language, the representation is translated into an abstract concept.

2. Rational, logical knowledge(thinking). Features of rational cognition: reliance on the results of sensory cognition; abstractness and generalization; reproduction of internal regular connections and relationships.

Forms of rational knowledge: a) a concept (the unity of essential properties, connections and relations of objects or phenomena reflected in thinking); b) judgment (a form of thinking in which something is affirmed or denied about an object, its properties or relations between objects); c) inference (a reasoning in the course of which a new judgment is derived from one or more judgments, called a conclusion, conclusion or consequence). Types of inferences: deductive (the way of thinking from the general to the particular, from the general position to the special), inductive (the way of reasoning from particular provisions to general conclusions), traductive (by analogy).

Sensual and rational cognition cannot be opposed, absolutized, since they complement each other. Hypotheses are created with the help of imagination. The presence of imagination allows a person to exercise creativity.

scientific knowledge- a special type of cognitive activity aimed at developing objective, systematically organized and substantiated knowledge about nature, man and society. Features of scientific knowledge: objectivity; development of the conceptual apparatus; rationality (conclusiveness, consistency); verifiability; high level of generalization; universality (explores any phenomenon from the side of patterns and causes); the use of special methods and methods of cognitive activity.

* Levels of scientific knowledge: one). Empirical. Methods of empirical knowledge: observation, description, measurement, comparison, experiment; 2). Theoretical. Methods of the theoretical level of knowledge: idealization (the method of scientific knowledge, in which the replacement of individual properties of the object under study with symbols or signs), formalization; mathematization; generalization; modeling.

* Forms of scientific knowledge: scientific fact (reflection of an objective fact in human consciousness); empirical law (objective, essential, concrete-universal, recurring stable connection between phenomena and processes); question; problem (conscious formulation of questions - theoretical and practical); hypothesis (scientific assumption); theory (initial foundations, an idealized object, logic and methodology, a set of laws and statements); concept (a certain way of understanding (interpreting) an object, phenomenon or process; the main point of view on the subject; a guiding idea for their systematic coverage).

* Universal methods of scientific knowledge: analysis; synthesis; deduction; induction; analogy; modeling (reproduction of the characteristics of one object on another object (model), specially created for their study); abstraction (mental abstraction from a number of properties of objects and the allocation of some property or relationship); idealization (mental creation of any abstract objects that are fundamentally not feasible in experience and reality).

Forms of non-scientific knowledge:

myth; life experience; folk wisdom; common sense; religion; art; parascience.

Intuition is a specific component of the connection between sensory and rational cognition. Intuition- the ability of human consciousness in some cases to catch the truth by intuition, conjecture, based on previous experience, on previously acquired knowledge; insight; direct knowledge, cognitive premonition, cognitive insight; super fast thought process. Types of intuition: 1) sensual, 2) intellectual, 3) mystical.

Classification of forms of cognition according to the type of human spiritual activity

* Existential ( J.-P. Sartre, A. Camus, K. Jaspers and M. Heidegger). The cognitive sphere includes emotions and feelings (not sensations) of a person. These experiences are ideological and spiritual in nature.

* Morality is not only a personal form of regulation of human behavior, but also a special form of knowledge. Morality must be learned, and its presence speaks of the spiritual development of a person.

* Aesthetic knowledge has received the greatest development in art. Features: learns the world from the point of view of beauty, harmony and expediency; is not given with birth, but is brought up; is one of the spiritual ways of cognition and activity; it is not aimed, unlike scientific knowledge, at a specific benefit; is entirely creative in nature, does not copy reality, but creatively perceives it. Moreover, it can create its own, aesthetic reality, which is capable of spiritually influencing a person, transforming, transforming and improving his nature.

True- correspondence between facts and statements about these facts. objective truth- the content of knowledge, which is determined by the subject being studied, does not depend on the preferences and interests of a person. subjective truth depends on the perception of the subject, his worldview and attitudes.

Relative truth- incomplete, limited knowledge; such elements of knowledge that in the process of development of knowledge will change, be replaced by new ones. Relative truth depends on the point of view of the observer, it is changeable (this is what the theory of relativity says).

absolute truth- complete, exhaustive knowledge of reality; that element of knowledge that cannot be refuted in the future.

Absolute truth and relative truth different levels (forms) of objective truth.

In form, truth can be: worldly, scientific, artistic, moral, etc., therefore, there can be as many truths as there are types of knowledge. Scientific truth, for example, is distinguished by the system, orderliness of knowledge, its validity and evidence. Spiritual truth is nothing but the correct, conscientious attitude of a person towards himself, other people and the world.

Delusion- the content of the knowledge of the subject, which does not correspond to the reality of the object, but is taken as the truth. Sources of delusions: errors in the transition from sensory to rational cognition, incorrect transfer of someone else's experience. Lie- deliberate distortion of the image of the object. Disinformation- this is a substitution for selfish reasons of reliable unreliable, true - false.

Reasons for the relativity of human knowledge: the variability of the world; limited cognitive abilities of a person; the dependence of the possibilities of cognition on real historical conditions, the level of development of spiritual culture, material production, and the characteristics of human cognitive activity.

The criterion of truth depends on the form and method of cognition. It can be empirical, that is, experimental (in science); rationalistic (in science and philosophy); practical (in science, social practice); speculative (in philosophy and religion). In sociology, the main criterion of truth is practice, which includes material production, accumulated experience, experiment, supplemented by the requirements of logical consistency and, in many cases, the practical usefulness of certain knowledge.

Practice - material, purposeful activity of people.

Functions of practice in the process of learning: 1) the source of knowledge (the needs of practice brought to life the existing sciences); 2) the basis of knowledge (due to the transformation of the surrounding world, the most profound knowledge of the properties of the surrounding world occurs); 3) practice is the driving force behind the development of society; 4) practice is the goal of cognition (a person cognizes the world in order to use the results of cognition in practical activities); 5) practice is a criterion for the truth of knowledge.

Main types of practice: scientific experiment, production of material goods, socially transforming activity of the masses. Practice structure: object, subject, need, goal, motive, expedient activity, object, means and result.

From the book Philosophy: lecture notes author Melnikova Nadezhda Anatolyevna

Lecture No. 25 Actually, this is the question of the criterion of truth. In the history of philosophy and science, different points of view on this matter have been expressed. Yes, Descartes

From the book Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions author Serov Vadim Vasilievich

Lecture No. 26. The beauty and value of truth (the unity of beauty, truth and goodness) Undoubtedly, the recognition of such eternal values ​​as truth, beauty and goodness (and each value separately) is a hallmark of the humane in man. Known disagreements give themselves

From the book All masterpieces of world literature in brief. Plots and characters. Russian literature of the XX century the author Novikov V I

The moment of truth From Spanish: El momento de la verdad. So in Spanish bullfighting is called the decisive moment of the fight, when it becomes clear who will be the winner - the bull or the matador. The expression became popular after it appeared in the novel Death in the Afternoon (1932) by the American

From the book Social Science: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

The moment of truth IN AUGUST FORTY-FOURTH ... Roman (1973) In the summer of 1944, all of Belarus and a significant part of Lithuania were liberated by our troops. But in these territories there were many enemy agents, scattered groups of German soldiers, gangs, underground organizations. All

From the book Driving School for Women author Gorbachev Mikhail Georgievich

18. KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD. THE CONCEPT AND CRITERIA OF TRUTH Cognition is the acquisition by a person of information and knowledge about the surrounding world. A person learns with the help of hearing, smell, touch, vision. Forms of knowledge: sensation (elementary, one-time result of the impact of the surrounding world on the organ

From the book Be an Amazon - ride fate author Andreeva Julia

Technical Truths

From the book The Newest Philosophical Dictionary. Postmodernism. author

Simple truths of operation and driving If the car breaks down, turn on the emergency lights, set the warning triangle and calm down. Ignore if you are honked. Is the breakdown small? Call technical assistance. In case of a major breakdown, it is better to call

From the book Amazing Philosophy author Gusev Dmitry Alekseevich

Harmful Truths What other covenants have been vetoed? A. Smir Convinced of the strength and harm of the habitual Amazon, she must track her own stereotypes of behavior in order to refuse to obey them. Such bad habits include any actions and deeds

From the book The Newest Philosophical Dictionary author Gritsanov Alexander Alekseevich

“GAMES OF TRUTH” - a conceptual structure proposed by M. Foucault (see) to denote the plural procedural nature of the production of knowledge, in the context of a postmodern revision of traditional ideas about truth (see). According to Foucault, truth is not the result of

From the book Cheat Sheet on Intellectual Property Law author Rezepova Victoria Evgenievna

From the book Informing. The path of personal success author Baranov Andrey Evgenievich

From the author's book

DUAL TRUTH theory - a philosophical assumption widespread in the Middle Ages about the fundamental possibility of an intellectual situation, within the boundaries of which a scientific position (gesis) can simultaneously act as true and false (depending on

From the author's book

30. Concept and criteria of patentability of an invention An invention is a technical solution recognized as an invention by the state and protected by it in accordance with the legislation in force in each country. The invention itself is intangible, however

From the author's book

32. The concept and criteria for patentability of a utility model A utility model is a new and industrially applicable technical solution related to a device. The concept of "utility model" usually covers such technical innovations that, by their external features,

From the author's book

33. The concept and criteria for the protection of an industrial design An industrial design is an artistic and design solution for an industrial or handicraft product that determines its appearance. The term "art and design solution"

From the author's book

Informing lies (not truths) There is only one "immutable" thing that cannot be refuted - this is the truth. For many centuries, humanity has been arguing with itself about what truth is and how to determine whether it is truth or not. Complicated truths based on

achievement of scientific truth.

In relation to philosophy, truth is not only the goal of knowledge, but also the subject of research. It can be said that the concept of truth expresses the essence of science. Philosophers have long been trying to develop a theory of knowledge that would allow us to consider it as a process of obtaining scientific truths. The main contradictions along this path arose in the course of opposing the activity of the subject and the possibility of him developing knowledge corresponding to the objective real world. But truth has many aspects, it can be considered from a variety of points of view: logical, sociological, epistemological, and finally, theological.

What is truth? The origins of the so-called classical philosophical concept truths date back to antiquity. For example, he believed that “the one who speaks about things in accordance with what they are, speaks the truth, the same one who speaks about them differently, is lying.” For a long time, the classical concept of truth dominated the theory of knowledge. In the main, she proceeded from the position: what is affirmed by thought really takes place. And in this sense, the concept of the correspondence of thoughts to reality coincides with the concept of “adequacy”. In other words, truth is a property of the subject, consisting in the agreement of thinking with itself, with its a priori (pre-experimental) forms. So, in particular, believed I. Kant. Subsequently, the truth began to mean the property of the ideal objects themselves, irrespective of human knowledge, and a special kind of spiritual values. Augustine developed the doctrine of the innateness of true ideas. Not only philosophers, but also representatives of private sciences are faced with the question of what is meant by reality, how to perceive reality or the real world? Materialists and idealists identify the concept of reality, reality with the concept of the objective world, i.e. with what exists outside and independently of man and humanity. However, man himself is part of the objective world. Therefore, without taking into account this circumstance, it is simply impossible to clarify the question of truth.

Taking into account the directions in philosophy, taking into account the originality of individual statements expressing the subjective opinion of a particular scientist, truth can be determined as an adequate reflection of objective reality by the cognizing subject, during which the cognized object is reproduced as it exists outside and independently of. Consequently, truth enters into the objective content of human knowledge. But as soon as we are convinced that the process of cognition is not interrupted, then the question arises about the nature of truth.

After all, if a person perceives the objective world in a sensual way and forms ideas about it in the process of individual cognition and his mental activity, then the question is natural - how can he make sure that his statements correspond to the objective world itself? Thus, we are talking about the criterion of truth, the identification of which is one of the main tasks of philosophy. There is no consensus among philosophers on this issue. The extreme point of view boils down to a complete denial of the criterion of truth, because, according to its supporters, truth either does not exist at all, or, in short, it is characteristic of everything and everyone.

idealists- supporters of rationalism - thought itself as a criterion of truth, since it has the ability to clearly and distinctly present an object. Philosophers such as Descartes and Leibniz proceeded from the idea of ​​the self-evidence of the original truths comprehended with the help of intellectual intuition. Their arguments were based on the ability of mathematics to objectively and impartially reflect the diversity of the real world in its formulas. True, this raised another question: how, in turn, to be convinced of the reliability of their clarity and distinctness? Logic, with its rigor of proof and its irrefutability, should have come to the rescue here.

So, I. Kant allowed only a formal-logical criterion of truth, according to which knowledge must be consistent with the universal formal laws of reason and reason. But the reliance on logic did not eliminate the difficulties in the search for a criterion of truth. It turned out to be not so easy to overcome the internal consistency of thinking itself, it turned out that sometimes it is impossible to achieve formal-logical consistency of judgments developed by science with initial or newly introduced statements (conventionalism).

Even the rapid development of logic, its mathematization and division into many special areas, as well as attempts at a semantic (semantic) and semiotic (sign) explanation of the nature of truth, did not eliminate the contradictions in its criteria.

Subjective idealists- supporters of sensationalism - saw the criterion of truth in the direct evidence of the sensations themselves, in the consistency of scientific concepts with sensory data. Subsequently, the principle of verifiability was introduced, which got its name from the concept of verification of a statement (checking its truth). In accordance with this principle, any statement (scientific statement) is meaningful or meaningful only if it can be verified. The main emphasis is placed on the logical possibility of clarification, and not on the actual one. For example, due to the underdevelopment of science and technology, we cannot observe the physical processes taking place in the center of the Earth. But by means of assumptions based on the laws of logic, one can put forward a corresponding hypothesis. And if its provisions turn out to be logically consistent, then it should be recognized as true. It is impossible not to take into account other attempts to identify the criterion of truth with the help of logic, which are characteristic in particular for the philosophical trend called logical positivism.

Supporters of the leading role of human activity in cognition tried to overcome the limitations of logical methods in establishing the criterion of truth. The pragmatic concept of truth was substantiated, according to which the essence of truth should be seen not in accordance with reality, but in accordance with the so-called “final criterion”. Its purpose is to establish the usefulness of truth for practical actions and actions of a person. It is important to note that from the point of view of pragmatism, utility in itself is not a criterion of truth, understood as the correspondence of knowledge to reality. In other words, the reality of the external world is inaccessible to a person, since a person directly deals with the results of his activity. That is why the only thing that he is able to establish is not the correspondence of knowledge to reality, but the effectiveness and practical usefulness of knowledge. It is the latter, acting as the main value of human knowledge, that deserves to be called truth. And yet philosophy, overcoming extremes and avoiding absolutization, has approached a more or less correct understanding of the criterion of truth. It could not have been otherwise: if humanity faced the need to question not only the consequences of the momentary activity of this or that person (in some, and often, cases very far from the truth), but also to deny their own centuries-old history, life would be impossible to perceive differently, how absurd. Only the concept of objective truth, based on the concept of objective reality, allows us to successfully develop the philosophical concept of truth. We emphasize once again that the objective or real world exists not just by itself, but only when it comes to knowing it.

Relative and absolute truths

The limited practical capabilities of a person is one of the reasons for the limitedness of his knowledge, i.e. it is about the relative nature of truth. is knowledge that reproduces the objective world approximately, incompletely. Therefore, the signs or features of relative truth are proximity and incompleteness, which are interconnected. Indeed, the world is a system of interconnected elements, any incomplete knowledge about it as a whole will always be inaccurate, coarsened, fragmentary.

At the same time, the concept of absolute truth is also used in philosophy. With its help, an important aspect of the development of the process of cognition is characterized. Note that the concept of absolute truth in philosophy has not been sufficiently developed (with the exception of its metaphysical, idealistic branch, where absolute truth, as a rule, correlates with the idea of ​​God as the original creative and creative force). The concept of absolute truth is used to characterize one or another specific aspect of any true knowledge, and in this sense it is similar to the concepts “ objective truth" and " relative truth". The concept “ absolute truth”should be considered inextricably linked with the process of cognition itself. The same process is, as it were, a movement along the steps, which means the transition from less perfect scientific ideas to more perfect ones, however, the old knowledge is not discarded, but at least partially included in the system of new knowledge. It is this inclusion, reflecting the continuity (in the historical sense), the internal and external integrity of knowledge and representing truth as a process, that constitutes the content of the concept of absolute truth. Let us remind once again that, first of all, the material activity of man has an impact on the material world. But when it comes to scientific cognition, it means that out of the whole variety of properties inherent in the objective world, only those that constitute the historically conditioned object of cognition stand out. That is why practice, which has absorbed knowledge, is a form of their direct connection with objective objects and things. This is where the function of practice as a criterion of truth manifests itself.

Truth and its criteria

In order to prove the truth of a statement, it is necessary to somehow verify it. This verification tool is called criterion of truth(from the Greek. kriterion - a measure for evaluation).

Basic concepts of truth

The concept of truth

Definition of truth

Criterion of truth

classical

Truth is the correspondence of thoughts and statements to reality.

Sense experience and/or clarity and distinctness

coherent

Truth is the consistency of knowledge

Consistency with a common knowledge system

pragmatic

Truth is practically useful knowledge

Efficiency, practice

Conventional

Truth is agreement

universal consent

Scientists have proposed various criteria for how to distinguish true from false:

  • Sensualists rely on the data of the senses and consider the criterion of truth sensory experience. In their opinion, the reality of the existence of something is verified only by feelings, and not by abstract theories.
  • Rationalists believe that the senses are capable of misleading us, and see the basis for testing propositions in the mind. For them, the main criterion of truth is clarity and distinctness. Mathematics is considered an ideal model of true knowledge, where each conclusion requires clear evidence.
  • Rationalism finds further development in the concept of coherence (from Latin cohaerentia - adhesion, connection), according to which the criterion of truth is consistency reasoning with a common system of knowledge. For example, "2x2 = 4" is true not because it coincides with a real fact, but because it is in agreement with the system of mathematical knowledge.
  • Supporters of pragmatism (from the Greek pragma - business) consider the criterion of truth efficiency knowledge. True knowledge is proven knowledge that successfully "works" and allows you to achieve success and practical benefits in daily affairs.
  • In Marxism, the criterion of truth is declared practice(from the Greek praktikos - active, active), taken in the broadest sense as any developing social activity of a person to transform himself and the world (from worldly experience to language, science, etc.). Only a statement verified by practice and experience of many generations is recognized as true.
  • For supporters of conventionalism (from Latin convcntio - agreement), the criterion of truth is universal consent about the statements. For example, scientific truth is what the overwhelming majority of scientists agree with.

Some criteria (consistency, efficiency, agreement) go beyond the classical understanding of truth, therefore, they speak of a non-classical (respectively, coherent, pragmatic and conventional) interpretation of truth. The Marxist principle of practice attempts to combine pragmatism and the classical understanding of truth.

Since each criterion of truth has its drawbacks, all criteria can be considered as complementary. In this case, only that which satisfies all the criteria can be unequivocally called true.

There are also alternative interpretations of truth. Thus, religion speaks of a supramental truth, the basis of which is Holy Scripture. Many modern movements (for example, postmodernism) generally deny the existence of any objective truth.

Modern science adheres to the classical interpretation of truth and believes that truth is always objective(does not depend on the desires and moods of a person), specific(there is no truth "in general", without clear conditions), procedural(is in the process of constant development). The last property is revealed in terms of relative and absolute truth.

The search for truth is aimed at identifying the facts corresponding to the object of study and (or) analysis, reflecting it in reality. For the first time close to this definition was given by Aristotle.

Subsequently, philosophers repeatedly turned to this concept. So, Montaigne believed that there is an exclusively subjective truth. He proceeded from the impossibility of obtaining knowledge that fully and reliably reflected the world. This trend later became known as skepticism.

Bacon takes a different position. From his point of view, the objective nature of truth cannot be denied. But it is established exclusively by experience. Anything that cannot be verified is questioned. Such criteria of truth are observed in empiricism. Another rather curious approach was demonstrated by Hume. His criterion of truth is sensation. The philosopher believed that the world can and should be known by the senses, emotions, intuition. His criteria for truth were repeatedly criticized, but found a fairly wide response in literature, especially in poetry.

Considered the concept of truth and the great philosopher Immanuel Kant. He criticized excessive rationality, considering it presumptuous, and became the founder of agnosticism. The thinker believed that the truth and its criteria will never be fully studied, because it is simply impossible. He created the concept of "thing in itself", the unknowable.

And finally, Descartes introduced his concept of truth. Despite the fact that most people know, basically, his famous phrase, this philosopher and mathematician turned out to have a whole system of views. For him, truth is knowledge, the reliability of which is verified by the very mind. The scientist pays attention to the ability of a person to be his own critic. Which includes self-observation, analysis and working with conclusions. By introducing this criterion of truth, Descartes founded rationalism.

The debate over the criterion of truth continues today. However, in order to demonstrate knowledge of social science, one must understand existing points of view. Being familiar with them does not automatically mean agreeing. When looking for an answer to the question of whether the following judgments about truth are true, one can and should be guided not only by knowledge, but also by logic. But knowledge of social science material is usually demonstrated by specific intended answers, even if you disagree with them for various reasons. There is a curriculum.

So, the main criterion of truth for dialectical materialism is practice. In general, the modern approach has absorbed a lot from a number of philosophers. And speaking of what is the criterion of truth, there are three main ways of verification. So this is:

1. Sensory experience

Despite the fact that the organs of vision can deceive us, there is a high probability that the information they receive is true. Here its understanding already depends on what is meant by this or that concept.

2. Theoretical justification

Truth is knowledge that is tested by the laws of logic and science. If a fact contradicts them, its veracity is questioned.

3. Practice as a criterion of truth

It is necessary to explain what meaning is put today in this approach. In general, it is interpreted as broadly as possible. But the main point here was the opportunity to study something in laboratories, to obtain data empirically, to investigate either the object itself or the traces that the material world wears.

The last point needs more explanation. So, it is impossible not to take into account the conditions of the surrounding reality. Dinosaurs died out in it, although the truth is that they were. Nevertheless, it is quite difficult to study them today. At the same time, they left their mark on history. There are other examples: distant space objects are a very inconvenient subject of study. Nevertheless, remoteness in time, in space does not become a reason to doubt that both of them, at least, existed. So the difficulty of research does not affect the recognition of the truth.

Kinds of truth

Truth is knowledge, which may be exhaustive or incomplete, depending on the availability of the object of study, on the availability of a material base, existing knowledge, the level of development of science, and so on. If everything is already known about a particular phenomenon or subject, subsequent scientific discoveries cannot refute such a fight, then this is an absolute truth, in fact there is not very much absolute truth, because almost all areas of science are developing, our knowledge about the world around us is constantly replenished. And often they transform.

If we talk about absolute truths, then such statements can be a striking example: the human body is mortal, living organisms need to eat, the planet Earth moves around its axis. In most cases, practice has become the criterion of truth, although not always. The solar system was largely studied first analytically, by calculations, and then the facts were already confirmed empirically.

Even social scientists consider such a concept as relative truth. As an example, we can cite the device of the atom, which was constantly refined. Or human anatomy: from a certain point on, doctors stopped being delusional about the work of most organs, but they did not always clearly imagine certain internal mechanisms. It is noticeable that dialectics helped a lot here, because only by practice were the criteria of truth established in the medical field. This very clearly demonstrates how purely theoretical and applied areas can intersect. Other stories on this topic can be found on the Web if you search for data on the topic "practice is the criterion of truth."

It is also worth understanding what is objective truth. Its fundamental difference is independence from a person, his consciousness and activity. In general, you can dwell on the three varieties listed. There are other classifications, but you should definitely familiarize yourself with these types (this is required by the plan). However, if you want clarifications, select the concept of truth and its criteria on the Internet. Today it will not be difficult to find more detailed information on any of the philosophical teachings and statements on the topic under discussion.