Adeline super instructions for use Rosselkhoznadzor. Registration system for medicines and feed additives

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE RF
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL POLICY AND EDUCATION
FSBEI HPE DON STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

About the use of the drug "Adilin"

Adilin belongs to the “muscle relaxants” group of drugs, the mechanism of action of which in small doses is a reversible short-term immobilization of the body due to a depolarization disorder in the transmission of excitation from the motor nerves to the muscle fibers of skeletal muscles. Muscle relaxants are widely used both in veterinary practice (Rompun, Rometar, etc.) and in medical practice (Ditilin, Listenone, etc.) - for controlled immobilization of patients in depth and duration during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that cause a defensive reaction (introduction probes, reduction of dislocations; restoration of the relative position of bone fragments and other surgical operations). Unlike narcotic drugs, depolarizing muscle relaxants do not cause side effects, since in the process of their metabolism non-toxic products are formed, which are already constantly present in the body - choline and succinic acid. The drug has an effect only when administered parenterally (not through the digestive tract).
When high doses of the drug are used, it causes the death of the body, and it has been established that bioelectrical activity of the brain fades before cardiac activity stops, which is the direct cause of death of the body, occurring 15...60 seconds after the administration of the lethal dose of the drug recommended by the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation. Paralysis of the respiratory muscles against the background of cardiac arrest practically no longer plays any pathogenetic role. Thus, we can confidently say that the moment of death comes unnoticed by the brain.
The above was the basis for recommending Adilin as a humane means for the bloodless slaughter of animals. However, with such slaughter, the carcass is not bled and the sanitary standards in force in Russia do not allow the use of the drug for slaughtering animals for meat used for human consumption, therefore, according to the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation, the drug is intended for the slaughter of only fur-bearing animals, dogs and cats ("Temporary Instruction" on the use of Adilin-super for the slaughter of fur-bearing animals, cats and dogs" approved by the Main Directorate of Veterinary Medicine with the State Veterinary Inspectorate on April 24, 1991 - copy attached), as well as for forced slaughter, with subsequent destruction or disposal of corpses, cattle, pigs, sheep , rabbits, deer and poultry ("Instructions for the use of Adilin for bloodless slaughter of animals"; approved by the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance in 2008; registration No. PVR-2-7.7/02169 - copy attached).
The above gives us grounds to respond to the essence of your request: the use of pharmacological agents “Adilin”, “Adilin-super” and other xylazine-containing drugs for slaughter of animals is not inhumane, since it does not cause suffering to the animal. Their use for the capture and euthanasia of stray animals does not contradict the legal framework of the Russian Federation, since it is prescribed by the above-mentioned legal acts.

Head Department of Anatomy, Physiology of Domestic Animals, Biology and Histology, Professor V.Kh. Fedorov
Associate Professor of Animal Physiology Course V.S. Stepanenko
Associate Professor of the course of pharmacology and toxicology N.V. Sumin

Sadistic Obninsk utility workers kill animals in front of children and do not distinguish sleeping pills from poison!

Townspeople are accustomed to the sad news that someone in the city has brutally killed a cat or maimed a dog. But what happened in Obninsk just the other day goes beyond all conceivable boundaries of morality and humanity!

Obninsk mongrels die painfully and for a long time,
BUT ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS

Dmitry, an accidental witness to the murder of a stray dog, contacted our editorial office. It happened last Wednesday at half past five in the evening. Driving past the Khrushchev apartment buildings near the station, he saw a dog on the side of the road in convulsions, foaming at the mouth, and a woman and a child were crying near her, and a young guy was fussing.

My first thought was that the dog was hit by a car,” says Dmitry. “I decided to drive up to them and try to help them with something.” I myself train dogs at the Sphinx club and I have friends who are veterinarians. It turned out that no one hit the dog. A woman with a child saw a man come up, poke the animal with a stick and leave. The second guy and I decided to catch up with that man; fortunately, he didn’t go far. We grabbed him by the arms and asked what he did with the dog? It turned out that it was a utility service employee, he showed us his ID and explained that he was engaged in catching stray animals, and he gave an injection to the dog.

And while the unfortunate animal was struggling in its death throes, the man decided to take a walk, and after 10-15 minutes, when the dog died, return it, throw the body into the car and take it away. It's a common thing.

At this point we will stop and tell you what kind of injection it was and how, in general, issues with homeless animals are resolved in the science city.

The sanitary cleaning department at the MPKH is responsible for catching stray cats and dogs. They receive applications from city residents and organizations who complain about homeless animals. An MPKH employee receives the drug “Adeline Super” from the city veterinary station, finds an animal that matches the description and “immobilizes” it with an aluminum stick with an attached syringe. In theory, this event should be attended by a police officer who will keep order, as well as a representative of the organization that submitted the application, in order to, so to speak, identify the dog. But this time the “hunter” was completely alone.

HOW “ADELINE SUPER” KILLS

Now let’s make a “lyrical digression” and talk about the drug itself in order to understand the essence of the problem.

In many civilized cities of Russia, the use of “Adeline Super” was declared illegal, since as a result of its influence the animal dies a painful death from suffocation. But in the country’s first science city they have been using it for quite a long time; they consider its use humane and are not going to abandon it.

“Adeline” is used on fur farms as euthanasia for the supposedly humane killing of animals. The drug causes a slow, painful death by gradually paralyzing the peripheral and respiratory muscles. The animal tries to take a breath, but it fails because the muscles atrophy. Being fully conscious, the animal experiences panic and dies for a long time and is extremely painful. But outwardly it may look like falling asleep, which misleads inexperienced eyewitnesses.

"Adeline Super" belongs to group A drugs - poisons. They or its analogues are actually used when euthanizing animals in veterinary clinics. But in veterinarians this is done differently: first, the animal receives anesthesia. And only when consciousness turns off, a drug is administered that slows down the heartbeat, and the animal dies without suffering.

But in Obninsk, homeless “our little brothers” are injected with poison right away, without anesthesia or painkillers! And what’s even worse is that the perpetrators of the “death sentence” are sure that it is humane!

UTILITIES ARE CONFIDENT THAT THEY ACT HUMANELY

For comments, we turned to the head of the sanitary cleaning service of MPKH Lyudmila SAUTINA. Lyudmila Petrovna confirmed the information that, indeed, last week there was an application from the management of the station market, which complained about a whelping bitch and a cable. And also, either out of ignorance, or out of naivety, Lyudmila Petrovna began to assure us that “Adeline Super” “acts like anesthesia,” they say, the dog simply falls asleep.

That is, when a dog is in agony, is it anesthesia? - just in case, we asked again.

Of course, everything stops working for her, but then she wakes up,” said Lyudmila Sautina with complete confidence. - You see, every dog ​​requires a certain amount of sedative. Just like people, some dogs’ hearts can’t stand it and they don’t wake up. But basically in the veterinary clinic they give us a dose not for defeat, but for euthanasia.

We asked the same question several times: what percentage of dogs do not wake up after an injection, and each time the boss avoided answering, saying that, in theory, all dogs should wake up. But, in the end, the switches were transferred to the veterinary station, they say, whatever drug they are prescribed there, that’s what they administer.

In general, all these assurances that dogs do not die, but fall asleep, look rather implausible if we remember the story from three years ago about the massacre at the station market. Then all the four-legged pets that the traders fed were mercilessly exterminated in the same way. And witnesses to this terrible picture can say with one hundred percent certainty that the dogs died on the spot.

Apparently, Lyudmila Petrovna does not use the Internet and, even for the sake of simple curiosity, did not try to look for information about the drug with which she is dealing. Although, on the other hand, this may be completely voluntary ignorance and in this way the compassionate boss wants to convince herself that animals do not suffer when they are killed.

“HUNTERS” FROM MPKH WORK “WITH DESIRE”

By the way, at MPKH we met the “performer” himself - Yuri KUZMIN. He’s new to this business, but he can already tell you how to properly hit an animal so that it doesn’t run away and quickly passes out.

Before Yuri, another comrade who recently had a heart attack worked in this difficult position for more than twenty years (and, as we were assured, with dedication and desire). But Yuri is already addicted to his occupation and quite comically tells stories about how he refused to go into the basement with the cats because there were a lot of fleas there, or how one day he shot, and the dog ran away from him - the dose turned out to be too small .

And regarding the incident with the child and the mother, his version goes like this: when he “immobilized” the dog, there was no one nearby, the mother accidentally saw it and for some reason brought the child to see it.

Finally, we asked one more question to the head of the unit: does Lyudmila Petrovna think that even such a procedure should be made more humane?

“What strange questions you are asking me,” said the boss. - Well, please suggest how this can be done more humanely? We go to Kaluga to exchange experiences, and they do the same thing there!

And yet, it’s worth the employees of the sanitation department to delve into the Internet, maybe then they would find out why Kaluga is called the “city of flayers.”

HOMELESS ANIMALS ARE SHOOTING TO KILL

We couldn’t help but contact the director of the city veterinary station, Anatoly REVVO. Anatoly Nikolaevich also does not like to directly answer the questions asked about morality and starts talking about the irresponsibility of owners who abandon animals on the street. By the way, we completely agree with him regarding the global nature of this problem. But we still have the same question - why is the Adeline Super poison used in Obninsk?

Anatoly Revvo did not lie and directly said that he personally makes the euthanasia solution. By the way, one injection costs about 200 rubles, and as the head of the veterinary station explained, the city does not pay anything for this, they say, the veterinarian finances everything herself.

By the way, the cells were completely empty and suspiciously clean, as if no one had ever been placed in them. All this suggests that it is easier for the responsible services to immediately exterminate the animal rather than maintain it for some time.

TO PROTECT OBNINSK ANIMALS - AN ANCIENT DECISION OF THE CITY ASSEMBLY
AND NON-FOLLOWED INSTRUCTIONS

We will not present our entire dialogue with Anatoly Revvo and will put the issue of morality aside. Let's look at the law. Is it legal to exterminate an animal on site?

When carrying out their activities, public utilities are guided by the Instructions for catching animals signed by the head of the MPKH, as well as the “ancient” Decision of the city meeting No. 02-20 of 1997 “On strengthening work to regulate the keeping of dogs and cats.” We were not allowed to photograph the instructions, for fear of the anger of the director of the MPKh Sergei KLIMENKO, but in what we read we did not find a single word where it would be allowed to kill an animal on the spot. It also clearly states that “hunting” should be done in the morning, before people go to work.

As for the decision of the City Assembly, many of its points are simply not respected. Take, for example, the order for the sanitary and epidemiological service to participate in all joint activities to comply with these Rules - as you remember, the “hunter” was completely alone.

Or, for example, recommendations for housing offices to “equip a board at each entrance of a residential building to familiarize citizens with the materials: rules for keeping dogs and cats in the city of Obninsk, dog walking areas, addresses and telephone numbers of housing departments, catching services, veterinary and sanitary epidemiological services.” Have you seen something similar in your entrance?

WITHOUT TRIAL OR INVESTIGATION

And returning to the methods of catching. The regulatory documents clearly state that a stray animal should be immobilized and taken to the city veterinary station. Why then do the Obninsk services arbitrarily decide to destroy the unfortunate animal in the most painful way, without even giving it a chance to find its owner?

Why do organizations like “New Ark” and private clinics, which often perform operations on lost people free of charge, fight for every life, while others consider themselves entitled to destroy it without “trial and investigation”?

Surprisingly, utility workers are confident that all their actions are humane, they say, there were times when they strangled people with nooses or killed them with an electric fork. They are also confident that the murder of “Adelin” does not fall under Article 245 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Cruelty to Animals” and is not related to the violation of Article 137 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation “Animals”, which states that “cruelty to animals that is contrary to the principles of humanity is not allowed " What do you think, dear readers, is death from such a drug any easier than death at the hands of some knacker? What is humanity?

P.S

And finally, I would like to remember the words of Mayor Alexander AVDEEV at one of the press conferences. Journalists asked how he felt about the innovation in Ukraine, when, on the eve of the European Football Championship, stray animals were burned alive in a mobile crematorium. Alexander Alexandrovich then said that “Obninsk residents will not wait for something like this to happen again.”

We also want to ask the question: isn’t it time for the authorities not only to chat about the problem of homeless animals, but also to at least make an attempt to find a solution to it? Might it be worth updating regulations and amending Decisions and Decrees regarding this issue?

There are many examples of other cities when local courts made decisions to ban the use of “Adeline Super” and its analogues. Why is Obninsk worse?

Isn’t it time for supervisory authorities to check the activities of MPKH and the city veterinary station? Do they have the right to kill an animal right away, in front of women and children?

In the end, when the life of an animal loses its value, then the turn comes for the devaluation of human life.

Diana KORSHIKOVA

1. Submitted
The application was submitted to the department for supervision of the circulation of medicines for veterinary use

2. Sent to FSBI VGNKI
The registration dossier and samples were sent to the Federal State Budgetary Institution for registration tests

3. Registration testing agreement
An agreement was concluded between the applicant and the Federal State Budgetary Institution VGNKI to conduct registration tests

4. Payment made
Payment for registration tests at the Federal State Budgetary Institution VGNKI has been made

5. Registration tests
FSBI VGNKI conducts registration tests of samples

6. Preparation of an expert opinion
Based on registration tests, the Federal State Budgetary Institution VGNKI prepares an expert opinion

7.
The applicant is recommended to provide additional information/make changes to the documentation

8. Conclusion of the Federal State Budgetary Institution VGNKI
Based on the test results, the Federal State Budgetary Institution issues a conclusion on the possibility of registration of the medicinal product/feed additive

9. Documents submitted to Rosselkhoznadzor
After registration tests were carried out at the Federal State Budgetary Institution VGNKI, the documents were submitted for consideration to the “Department for Supervision of the Circulation of Medicines for Veterinary Use” of Rosselkhoznadzor

10. Harmonization of regulatory documents
The head of the veterinary supervision department of Rosselkhoznadzor coordinates regulatory and technical documentation and instructions for use

11. Documents have been sent for revision
The applicant is recommended to make changes to the regulatory and technical documentation/instructions for use

12. Documentation approval
The Deputy Head of Rosselkhoznadzor approves the regulatory and technical documentation for the medicinal product/feed additive

13. Registered / Listed
Date of state registration of the medicinal product/feed additive

14. Deregistered
The application was withdrawn from registration at the request of the applicant or by decision of Rosselkhoznadzor

15. Registration suspended
The state registration procedure has been suspended

16. Application suspended
Application suspended

17. State registration denied
According to the conclusion of the expert commission, state registration was denied

18. Registration canceled
Registration canceled

19. Confirmation of state registration
An application for confirmation of state registration has been submitted

20. Alteration
Application for amendment submitted

Case No. 2-250/12

SOLUTION

IN THE NAME OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The Kirovsky District Court of Saratov, having considered in open court a civil case based on Semyk’s application to the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities “S.”; a third party who does not make independent claims regarding the subject of the dispute - the Administration of the Municipal Entity "..." for the prevention of harm,

u st a n o v i l:

Semyk appealed to the Kirovsky District Court with the above-mentioned claim, in support of which she indicated that, as she learned from the response of the acting. Chairman of the Committee on Housing and Communal Services of the Administration of the Moscow Region, in accordance with the agreement concluded between this committee and the defendant on the execution of a municipal order for the provision of services for the capture, transportation, sterilization, maintenance of stray animals (dogs), the defendant, during the validity of the contract, caught stray animals for several months, kept them from 4 to 10 days, sterilized, and then released back to the place of capture. This information is confirmed by the results of an inspection of the defendant by the Saratov Interdistrict Environmental Prosecutor's Office, which established that due to the lack of equipped facilities for keeping animals after sterilization, dogs were released into the external environment on the same day or kept in cages for several days. This is indicated in a letter from the head of the department for supervision of the implementation of laws on nature of the Volga Interregional Environmental Prosecutor's Office. In addition, from the article “Constellation of Mythical Dogs” in the newspaper “Moskovsky Komsomolets in Saratov”, the plaintiff learned that in parallel with these actions, the municipal unitary enterprise “S.”, according to the head of the veterinary service of this organization, Lyudmila Aksenevich, was and is catching stray animals in on a commercial basis. At the same time, all animals are killed without any temporary maintenance, and their corpses are disposed of in the Beccari pit. Thus, during the year alone, the Municipal Unitary Enterprise “S.”, according to Aksenevich, killed at least 1,086 stray dogs without keeping them after capture, and without vaccination against rabies. Later, Semyk became convinced that the defendant actually kills and disposes of captured animals when one of the citizens provided her with copies of the agreement between the defendant and the administration of ZATO Svetly and the act of work performed to catch and dispose of dogs under this agreement, certified by a specialist from the administration of CATO Svetly. Also, from a letter from the head of the department for supervision over the implementation of laws on nature of the Volga Interregional Environmental Prosecutor's Office P.D.S., the plaintiff learned that an audit conducted by the Saratov Interregional Environmental Prosecutor's Office established that the defendant provides services for catching and killing dogs that do not have an owner, according to applications of citizens and organizations at their expense, using the drugs “Adilin” and “Adilin-super” for killing. The defendant's charter states that this enterprise operates in accordance with current legislation. Federal legislation obliges organizations engaged in the capture (detention) of stray animals to keep each of the captured animals for at least 6 months in a specialized nursery, to vaccinate all captured animals against rabies (in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 1.2 and 9.5 of the sanitary rules SP 3... -10 “Prevention of Rabies among people", approved by the resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation and Articles 230-231 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. When catching stray animals, the defendant violates the specified norms of federal legislation: he illegally kills animals before acquiring ownership rights to them, does not ensure the maintenance of captured animals in a special nursery in for at least 6 months, their vaccination against rabies. Violation by the defendant of clause 9.5 of the Sanitary Rules by not vaccinating captured (detained) stray animals against rabies and not keeping them in a specialized nursery for at least 6 months, and releasing them back without vaccination on city streets creates a danger of harm to the plaintiff's health by increasing the risk of contracting a dangerous zooanthroponotic disease - rabies, creates a threat of violation of Semyk's constitutional rights to health and a favorable environment. Also creating a threat of harm to the health of the plaintiff are the illegal actions of the defendant in killing stray animals that are caught, because Semyk can at any time of the day become an accidental witness to the killing of stray animals by the defendant. For her, an impressionable and compassionate person, the experiences caused by such a cruel spectacle can provoke stress, severe depression, sleep disturbances, exacerbation of chronic diseases, heart attack, stomach ulcers, stroke and other health disorders of varying severity. It is impossible to predict in advance what exactly these disorders may be. Also, the illegal actions of the defendant in killing stray animals that are caught create a threat of harm to the plaintiff’s health also due to the fact that the animals are killed using a blowgun that shoots “flying syringes” (“darts”) filled with the drug “Adilin-super” (aka “Adilin "). According to the attached explanation of the director of LLC "V.", the developer of "Adilina-super" (aka "Adilin"), Professor G.R.D., after the injection of "Adilina-super" (aka "Adilin"), in accordance with instructions for this drug, it is necessary to inject an antidote (“Antidote is an antidote - a drug for the treatment of poisoning.” Thus, the developer of this drug himself confirms its toxicity, danger to health and even life in the scientific sense. He also points to this in the drug passport (attached), where it is written that the lethality of the outcome when using “Adilin-super” (aka “Adilin”) ranges from 15-60 seconds. up to 5-10 min. Although “Adilin-super” was re-registered with the Rosselkhoznadzor of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation and received a new abbreviated name “Adilin” and a new certificate of state registration, it must be taken into account that this drug, according to a letter from the Deputy Director of the Department of Industry Development of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation V.A. for use as a mass bloodless slaughter of animals and poultry in areas of occurrence of particularly dangerous diseases of animals and birds, this drug is not recommended for any other purposes. According to the attached expert opinion of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Ural State Agricultural Academy", the drug "Adilin-super" belongs to the group of muscle relaxants. This drug must be administered by a specially trained veterinarian in a specially designated area with restricted access to unauthorized persons. In this case, the administration of Adilin without prior anesthesia leads to painful death from suffocation, without loss of consciousness. The effect is similar and if the drug enters the human body, urgent medical care is required, without which respiratory arrest may occur and death may occur. Thus, the actions of the defendant in killing stray animals using “flying syringes” fired from a “blow gun” (hollow tube) filled with the drug “Adilin-super” (aka “Adilin”) create a threat of harm to Semyk’s health and a threat to her life, with a possible accidental hit of such a “flying syringe”. The plaintiff is the owner of a dog and periodically walks it on the territory where the defendant carries out its activities to catch stray animals. A dog being walked by Semyk may accidentally get lost and be caught and killed by the defendant earlier than 6 months after its capture, provided by law so that the plaintiff, as the owner, can find and return the lost animal detained by a specialized organization. That is, the defendant’s failure to comply with the statutory deadlines for keeping captured animals creates a danger of causing significant harm to her (the death of the dog) and a threat of violation of her rights. With reference to the above circumstances, Semyk asked the court to declare illegal the activities of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities “S. » to kill stray animals during or immediately after capture without ensuring that they are kept in a specialized nursery for at least six months and without vaccination against rabies. To recognize as illegal the use by the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." “Adilin-super” and “Adilin” preparations for catching stray animals. To prohibit the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." activities for catching stray animals without ensuring the possibility of keeping captured animals for at least six months in a specialized nursery, as well as vaccination against rabies.

Representatives of the defendant MUP BKO "S." Semyk’s claims were not recognized, indicating in their objections that MUP BKO “S.” operates in accordance with the Charter of the enterprise, the Federal Law “On State Municipal Unitary Enterprises”, the Federal Law “On the Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population”, the Federal Law “On Environmental Protection”, the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor “On strengthening measures to prevent the spread of rabies in the region", Sanitary Rules SP...-96 and Veterinary Rules VP...-96 "Prevention and control of infectious diseases, other regulatory legal acts. In accordance with clause 11 and clause 32 of Art. 16 of the federal law “On the general principles of organizing local self-government in the Russian Federation”, measures to catch and keep stray animals are measures to protect the life and health of people, the implementation of which is related to issues of local importance of the urban district. Currently, the procedure for catching and keeping stray domestic animals is not regulated by any legal act. One of the subjects of the statutory activities of MUP BKO "S." is the right to carry out activities to catch stray animals. For the period from May to August 2011, MUP BKO "S." carried out the capture, transportation, sterilization, and maintenance of stray animals (dogs) within the framework of the Resolution of the municipal administration “On the provision of subsidies for reimbursement of costs in connection with the provision of services for the capture, transportation, sterilization and maintenance of stray animals (dogs).” In accordance with the Decree of the municipal administration, MUP BKO "S." fully fulfilled its obligations on the basis of an agreement concluded between the Committee for Housing and Communal Services of the Municipal Administration and the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO "S.", providing for reimbursement of the costs of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO "S." for the provision of services for catching, transporting, sterilizing, keeping stray animals within the limits of funds provided by the budget of the municipal formation “...”. Subsequently, the parties signed an additional agreement to the agreement, where the amount of the subsidy for the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." was changed and amounted to 998,411.82 rubles. In pursuance of the Resolution of the municipal administration, MUP BKO "S." entered into an agreement with the Regional State Institution (OSI) “Saratov City Station for the Control of Animal Diseases” for the provision of veterinary services to the enterprise related to the provision of sterilization and castration of stray animals (dogs) captured by the municipal unitary enterprise BKO “S. " in the territory …. The provision of veterinary services related to the provision of sterilization and castration of stray animals (dogs) under the contract is confirmed by bilateral certificates of completion of work - the Regional State Institution (OSU) "Saratov City Station for the Control of Animal Diseases" and the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO "S." It should be noted that in the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." there is a veterinary service headed by its chief, and there are also workers to catch stray animals. These employees perform the functions assigned to them in accordance with the job descriptions of MUP BKO "S." and regulations. People who are not registered with a psychoneurological dispensary and who have been vaccinated against rabies are allowed to work on catching stray animals. Control over veterinary service employees is exercised by the head of the veterinary service, who maintains the necessary reporting documentation and stores medicinal products in accordance with legal requirements. Catching stray animals is carried out using a throwing device from nets or using a veterinary drug - adiline. The supply of adiline is carried out on the basis of an agreement concluded with V. LLC. The solution of this drug is prepared in accordance with the instructions for use of the drug. This instruction was approved by the Deputy Head of Rosselkhoznadzor Registration No. PVR-2-7.7/02169. The concentration of the solution used when catching stray animals is not dangerous to human life. The drug is stored in a strictly inaccessible place (safe) with the appointment of a person responsible for the storage and use of this drug (the head of the veterinary service). All work with adiline is carried out using special clothing and personal protective equipment. According to the Resolution of the municipal administration, MUP BKO "S." conscientiously fulfilled the obligations assigned to him. All actions were coordinated with the district administration and authorized representatives, and also confirmed by the necessary documents: applications, acts of catching, acts of work performed, acts of returning animals to their habitat, a journal on keeping stray animals. Within the framework of the agreement concluded between the Committee for Housing and Communal Services of the municipal administration and the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S.", costs for services performed for catching, transporting, sterilizing, and keeping stray animals are reimbursed to the enterprise within the limits of the funds provided for by the budget of the municipality, and from funds due in the amount of RUB 998,411.82. , incl. VAT - part of the amount in the amount of RUB 492,147.32, incl. VAT is due to the Regional State Institution (OSI) “Saratov City Station for the Control of Animal Diseases” for the rendered veterinary services for castration and sterilization of stray dogs. The above activities are carried out exclusively using humane methods in order to protect the life and health of people. Facts of cruelty to animals are not allowed. In addition, MUP BKO "S." believes that the plaintiff’s arguments are not supported by adequate evidence, are far-fetched, relate to the category of emotions, and the situations she describes are virtually simulated for the future or an indefinite time. MUP BKO "S." provides the customer with dog catching services solely on the basis of written requests from customers in relation to stray animals in the presence of the applicant, for which a certificate of completion of work is drawn up. Tariffs for services of MUP BKO "S." approved by local governments. When providing MUP BKO "S." services, the defendant is strictly guided by the statutory goals and objectives and relevant types of economic activity. At the same time, taking into account the explanation of the director of LLC “V.” G.R.D., the drug “Adilin” is the most humane means for the bloodless immobilization of dogs, cats and various other species of animals and birds; it is not classified as a psychotropic or narcotic substance. According to the director-chief physician of First Veterinary Clinic LLC, Doctor of Biological Sciences T.G.S. This method is not a method of cruelty to them, since pain sensitivity is lost under the influence of the drug. The defendant did not identify any facts of cruelty to animals by the internal affairs bodies in connection with the capture and killing of stray animals. In this regard, the use of “Adilina” by employees of the municipal unitary enterprise BKO “S.” carried out on the basis of instructions on labor protection during transportation and storage of the medicinal product, as well as job descriptions. MUP BKO "S." carries out activities to catch stray animals, sterilization is carried out by the Regional State Institution “Saratov City Animal Disease Control Station” on the basis of an agreement, which is documented in acts of work performed. Due to the lack of equipped facilities for keeping animals, after castration, dogs are released into the external environment on the same day. After sterilization, dogs are kept in cages for several days. In order to avoid re-capture, operated animals are equipped with collars. Payment for work performed is made in accordance with the resolution of the Administration ... dated ... ... only after documentary confirmation. In addition, MUP BKO "S." provides services for catching and killing dogs that do not have an owner at the request of citizens and organizations at their expense. The shooting of stray dogs and cats for the purpose of preventing rabies is permitted by clause 4.12 of the Veterinary and Sanitary Rules SP ...-96 VP ...-96 “Prevention and control of infectious diseases common to humans and animals”, approved by the State Committee for Sanitary and Epidemiological Supervision of Russia ... and the Department of Veterinary Medicine of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia … Animal corpses are placed at the enterprise’s animal burial ground in one of 4 biothermal pits that meet established veterinary and sanitary rules and regulations. Services for the burial of animal bodies, the handling of which requires precautions to avoid infection, are provided by the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." on the basis of a license to carry out activities for the collection, use, neutralization, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste. MUP BKO "S." has a land plot that is a landfill for waste disposal, including biological waste. According to the director - chief physician of First Veterinary Clinic LLC ... - Doctor of Biological Sciences T.G.S., this method is not a method of cruelty to them, since pain sensitivity is lost under the influence of the drug. In connection with the provision of municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." in the materials of the civil case of title documents indicating the subject and types of economic activity of the enterprise, we consider the indication of the applicant Semyk O.I. unlawful. about the supposedly obligatory for MUP BKO "S." vaccinating stray dogs against rabies. In the charter of MUP BKO "S." such type of activity as vaccinating stray dogs against rabies is not provided, therefore the defendant has no legal grounds for performing or providing this type of service... internal affairs regarding the capture and killing of stray pets in accordance with Art. 144-145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, checks were carried out to identify signs of a crime under Art. 254 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - cruelty to animals. However, the facts of ill-treatment were not confirmed, and therefore the initiation of a criminal case was refused. In connection with the above, there are no grounds for adopting acts of prosecutorial response. There are no actions on the part of the defendant that create a danger of harm and a threat of violation of rights in relation to the plaintiff, the activities of MUP BKO “S. » is carried out legally in accordance with the Charter of the enterprise, approved by the Property Management Committee... and other legislative and regulatory acts. Applicant reference Semyk O.I. present 230-231 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on keeping stray animals for 6 months must be inextricably linked with Art. 232 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on reimbursement of expenses for the maintenance of stray animals. However, the issue of reimbursement of expenses for maintaining dogs for the period of stay of stray animals for 6 months has not yet been resolved and there are no regulatory legal acts on this issue in ... or the city of Saratov. MUP BKO "S." — is not a charitable organization; the company does not receive any donations for the maintenance of dogs. Budget funding for the maintenance of dogs for the duration of their stay for 6 months to the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." is not implemented.

The representative of a third party who does not make independent claims on the subject of the dispute - the Administration of the Municipal Entity "..." at the court hearing objected to the satisfaction of the stated Semyk O.I. claims, supporting the defendant's arguments in the case.

After hearing the explanations of the persons involved in the case and examining the written materials of the case, the court came to the following conclusion.

According to the Charter of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S.", the enterprise is part of the housing and communal services system of the Municipal Entity "...". The enterprise was created for the purpose of producing products, performing work, providing services, making a profit and solving social problems. Among other activities, the enterprise carries out the capture of stray dogs and cats, their quarantine (vol...., ld...).

By the Decree of the Administration of the Municipal Formation "..." dated ... ... (vol. ..., ld ... the Regulations on the provision of subsidies for reimbursement of costs in connection with the provision of services for catching, transportation, sterilization, and maintenance of stray animals (dogs) were approved. According to the approved According to the regulation, the purpose of providing subsidies was to reimburse costs in connection with the provision of services for catching, transporting, sterilizing, keeping stray animals (dogs).The necessary conditions for providing a subsidy were: providing services for catching, transporting, sterilizing, keeping stray animals (dogs) or provision of services for the capture, transportation and maintenance of stray animals (dogs) and the presence of a valid contract with a specialized organization for the provision of sterilization services for animals (dogs).

It was also established that... an agreement was concluded between the Committee on Housing and Communal Services of the municipal administration "..." and the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S.", on the basis of the above Regulations.... (volume..., ld...). In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Committee for Housing and Communal Services of the municipal administration "...", as the main administrator, provided the recipient, represented by the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." subsidies for reimbursement of costs in connection with the provision of services for catching, transporting, sterilizing, keeping stray animals (dogs) within the limits of funds provided for by the budget of the municipal formation “...” for ... year.

As it was established during the consideration of the case, the defendant for ... a year, within the framework of the concluded agreements, carried out activities to catch, keep, and kill stray animals (dogs) both on the territory of the municipal entity "..." and on the territory of other municipal entities. These circumstances, which were not disputed by the defendant, are also confirmed by numerous case materials (copies of applications, copies of contracts, copies of the work acceptance certificate, etc.).

According to Art. 137 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, general rules on property apply to animals, unless otherwise established by law or other legal acts.

When exercising rights, cruelty to animals that is contrary to the principles of humanity is not allowed.

In accordance with Part 1 of Art. 230 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a person who has detained stray or stray livestock or other stray domestic animals is obliged to return them to the owner, and if the owner of the animals or his place of residence is unknown, no later than three days from the moment of detention, report the discovery of the animals to the police or local authority local governments that take measures to find the owner.

By virtue of Part 1 of Art. 231 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, if within six months from the date of the application for detention of stray domestic animals, their owner is not found or does not declare his right to them, the person who kept and used the animals acquires the right of ownership to them .

From the written response of the Deputy Prosecutor of the Saratov Interregional Environmental Prosecutor's Office from ... it follows that the Volga Interregional Environmental Prosecutor's Office conducted a repeated inspection on the issue of violations of the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." ... veterinary legislation when catching, sterilizing and killing stray domestic animals. The inspection showed that in the territory ... the catching of stray domestic animals is carried out by the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." ..., for which, by a resolution of the administration ... dated ... ..., a tariff was established in the amount of ... ruble ... kopecks. The audit also established that the head of the veterinary service of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO "S." ...measures have not been taken to comply with the requirements of SP 3....-..., approved. Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation dated ... N 54, regarding the maintenance of captured animals in special nurseries and their immunization against rabies. In relation to the head of the veterinary service of the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." ... the interdistrict environmental prosecutor initiated proceedings for an administrative offense under Art. ... Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences. To the director of the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." ... the environmental prosecutor submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of federal legislation. In addition, during the inspection it was established that the regional government authorities authorized to carry out veterinary, sanitary and epidemiological supervision, measures to eliminate violations of veterinary legislation, legislation in the field of ensuring the sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population, allowed by the municipal unitary enterprise BKO "S." ... were not accepted.

In accordance with Art. 1 of the Federal Law “On the Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population”, restrictive measures (quarantine) are administrative, medical, sanitary, veterinary and other measures aimed at preventing the spread of infectious diseases and providing for a special regime for economic and other activities, restricting the movement of the population and vehicles , cargo, goods and animals.

According to clause 1.2 of the Sanitary Rules SP ... 7-10 “Prevention of Rabies among People”, approved by the Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation ... ..., compliance with sanitary rules is mandatory for citizens, individual entrepreneurs and legal entities throughout the Russian Federation, including authorities state power and local government, officials, organizations, regardless of their legal form and form of ownership.

In accordance with clause 9.5 of the same Sanitary Rules, regulation of the number of stray animals is carried out by catching them and keeping them in special nurseries. All animals must be vaccinated against rabies. When implementing regional programs for the sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population, the organization and implementation of these activities falls within the powers of state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

By virtue of clause 4.2, 4.5 Sanitary Rules...-96. “Prevention and control of infectious diseases common to humans and animals. Rabies”, dogs, cats and other animals that have bitten people or animals (except those clearly suffering from rabies) are subject to immediate delivery by the owner or a special team for catching stray dogs and cats to the nearest veterinary hospital for examination and quarantine under the supervision of specialists for 10 days. At the end of the quarantine period, clinically healthy animals after preliminary vaccination can be returned to their owners, provided they are kept in isolation for 30 days. Animals infected with rabies are destroyed.

Thus, it is possible to make a diagnosis of “rabies” only on the basis of a set of measures and the results of laboratory tests, which were not carried out by the defendant. Evidence that the dogs killed by the defendant during the disputed period were sick or suspicious for disease, the court, contrary to the requirements of Art. 56 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, not presented.

The above regulatory and legal provisions refute the arguments of the representative of the defendant about the absence of the obligation for the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Public Utilities "Special Automobile Facility for City Cleaning" to vaccinate captured dogs against rabies before releasing them into their habitats, since one of the types of the defendant's statutory activities is the quarantine of stray dogs and cats.

As it was established during the consideration of the case, the catching of stray dogs is carried out by a special team of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO “S.”, which includes a veterinarian and animal catchers. Catching is carried out by persons who do not have veterinary education, using pneumatic weapons using the medicinal product for animals “Adilin-super”. The presence of these circumstances was confirmed at the court hearing by representatives of the defendant, as well as by employees of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise BKO “S.”, who were questioned at the court hearing as witnesses.

According to the letter of the Department of Industry Development of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation dated ... (vol. ..., ld ...), the drug "Adilin-super" is intended for use as a means of mass bloodless slaughter of animals and poultry in areas of occurrence of particularly dangerous diseases of animals and birds .

In accordance with the Instructions for the use of the drug "Adilin-super", approved by the head of the main department of veterinary medicine of the State Commission of the Council of Ministers of the USSR for Food and Procurement ... ..., this drug blocks the conduction of neuromuscular excitation, resulting in relaxation of skeletal muscles and immobilization with subsequent death. The lethality of the outcome when using the drug in doses intended for catching stray dogs and cats by public utilities is 15-60 seconds.

As follows from the expert opinion of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Ural State Agricultural Academy" (volume 1, pp. 30-31), the drug "Adilin-super" belongs to the group of muscle relaxants, the mechanism of action of the drug: relaxes the muscles. When the drug is administered, the muscles relax, including the respiratory ones, which leads to respiratory cessation, and after some time the heart stops. These drugs must be administered by a specially trained veterinarian in a specially designated area. The drug "Adilin-super" causes painful death from suffocation in animals. It is well known from veterinary practice that muscle relaxants of this type are used only under anesthesia and artificial respiration in surgery for operations. Without combination with anesthesia, immediately after the introduction of these poisons, the animal begins agony within 4 minutes: respiratory paralysis, convulsions, cardiac arrest and death from suffocation within 15-20 minutes, while the animal is fully conscious.

At the same time, according to the logbook for recording the movement of materials for catching stray animals, the medicinal product for animals “Adilin-super” is issued by the materially responsible person to the teams of catchers against receipt.

In fact, as it was established during the consideration of the case by the testimony of numerous witnesses, the defendant, when catching stray dogs in their habitats on the territory ..., and not in specially designated places, uses a drug for animals, which leads to the death of the animal when it is caught, as a result of which it is placed It is not possible to send a captured animal to a shelter for detention within the six-month period established by civil law, or to return it to the owner.

Thus, the actions of MUP BKO "S." on the use of the drug “Adilin-super” for the capture of stray animals, as well as the killing of stray animals in violation of the above Rules are illegal and also do not meet the principles of humanity.

In accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation dated ... ... “On Veterinary Medicine”, they regulate relations in the field of keeping pets, catching, killing and stray animals, ensuring the safety of people from the adverse physical, sanitary and psychological effects of pets, apply to all animals and are subject to compliance , both by all owners of pets in municipalities... and by organizations entrusted with the functions of catching
and killing of animals. In addition, the Modular Law on the Treatment of Animals, adopted at the 29th Plenary Session of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the CIS Member States (Resolution ... dated ..., also stipulates that temporary detention centers for animals are created by organizations that catch stray animals for the temporary detention of seized or otherwise way of alienated animals, found or captured stray animals and search for their owners or new owners.

The court agrees with the plaintiff’s arguments that the defendant’s disputed actions, which do not comply with legal requirements, create a potential threat of violation of her property rights as a dog owner; rights to a favorable environment and finds the claims of Semyk O.I. justified and subject to satisfaction.

By virtue of the provisions of Art. 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, one of the ways to protect civil rights is to suppress actions that violate the right or create a threat of its violation. Taking this into account, preventing the threat of violation of the rights of the plaintiff is possible by suppressing the unlawful actions of the defendant.

In accordance with Art. 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the state fee paid when filing a claim in court in the amount of 400 rubles is subject to recovery from the defendant in favor of the plaintiff.

Based on the above, guided by Art. Art. 194-199 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, court

To recognize as illegal the activities of the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." for killing stray animals during or immediately after capture without ensuring their maintenance in a specialized nursery for at least six months and without vaccination against rabies.

To recognize as illegal the use by the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." “Adilin-super” and “Adilin” preparations for catching stray animals.

To prohibit the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." activities for catching stray animals without ensuring the possibility of keeping captured animals for at least six months in a specialized nursery, as well as vaccination against rabies.

To collect from the Municipal Unitary Enterprise of Household Utilities "S." in favor of Semyk O.I. for reimbursement of legal expenses in the form of the state fee paid when filing a claim in court... (...) rubles.

The decision can be appealed to the Saratov Regional Court through the Kirov District Court ... within a month from the date the court made the decision in final form.

The Verkh-Isetsky District Court of Yekaterinburg considered the claim of the prosecutor of the Verkh-Isetsky district to recognize the illegal activities of the EMUP "Spetsavtobaza" in the use of the drug "Adilin-super" and its analogues for the capture of stray animals.

The basis for the prosecutor's filing of this claim with the court was the results of an inspection carried out at the request of the management of the Charitable Fund for Helping Homeless Animals. During the inspection, it was established that the killing of stray animals (in particular, dogs) is carried out by specially created teams (catchers) using the drug “Adilin-super”, as a result of which the animal dies a painful death from suffocation, which is extremely inhumane.

In addition, when carrying out activities to catch stray dogs, the enterprise EMUP "Spetsavtobaza" does not comply with the established rules for catching stray animals, since before destruction the dogs are not placed in a shelter, through which they could subsequently be returned to their lost owners.

Based on the results of the inspection, the prosecutor filed a lawsuit to recognize the illegal activities of EMUP "Spetsavtobaza" in the use of the drug "Adilin-super" and its analogues and to oblige the enterprise to create a shelter for captured stray and stray animals. The prosecutor's claims were satisfied by the court.

Help from the Animal Rights Protection Center “VITA”

Adilin-super and its analogues: ditilin, listenone:

• curare-like substances (curare poison is used by aboriginal Indian tribes of Latin America to brutally kill animals during hunting - arrows poisoned with poison are used);
• are widely and universally used by local city authorities in Russia to catch and kill stray animals (catchers use blowpipe or guns that shoot syringes);
• also used on fur farms as a supposedly humane killing of animals doomed to die for fur;
• It is also widely used in veterinary practice (both public clinics and private) for supposedly humane killing;
• causes a slow, painful death as a result of gradual paralysis of the respiratory muscles. those. the animal, being fully conscious, dies for a long time and extremely painfully, but outwardly it looks like falling asleep, which misleads inexperienced eyewitnesses, for example, animal owners who naively believe that they are alleviating the suffering of their terminally ill pet - a dog or cat;
• used in medicine and veterinary medicine for a number of diseases, but with mandatory ventilation
• in civilized countries, the use of curare-like drugs for killing animals is prohibited and criminalized;
• being potent drugs, they are used by catchers of stray animals - people of an openly marginal, carnivorous type, which poses a mortal danger not only for animals (catchers do not know who to shoot), but also for the health and life of people around them (tragic cases are known) . By a strange logic, they were ignored by the Drug Control Service (FSKN of Russia), which from the beginning was engaged in a fruitless hunt for ketamine “witches”, depriving Russian animals of pain relief during surgical operations, i.e. doomed animals to torture, and also subjected veterinarians who honestly performed their medical duty to absurd repressions
• All over the world, barbiturates are used to euthanize animals for veterinary indications, which turn off the animal’s consciousness and put it into deep sleep.