Stages of the Livonian War table of historical figures. Causes of the Livonian War (briefly)

Livonian War(1558-1583) was fought by the Russian Kingdom for territories in the Baltic states and access to the Baltic Sea in order to break the blockade by the Livonian Confederation, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Sweden and establish direct communication with European countries.

Background

The Livonian Confederation was interested in controlling the transit of Russian trade and significantly limited the opportunities of Russian merchants. In particular, all trade exchanges with Europe could only be carried out through the Livonian ports of Riga, Lindanise (Revel), Narva, and goods could only be transported on ships of the Hanseatic League. At the same time, fearing the military and economic strengthening of Russia, the Livonian Confederation prevented the transport of strategic raw materials and specialists to Russia (see the Schlitte Affair), receiving the assistance of the Hanseatic League, Poland, Sweden and the German imperial authorities.

In 1503, Ivan III concluded a truce with the Livonian Confederation for 50 years, under the terms of which it had to annually pay tribute (the so-called “Yuriev tribute”) for the city of Yuryev (Dorpat), which previously belonged to Novgorod. Treaties between Moscow and Dorpat in the 16th century traditionally mentioned the “Yuriev tribute,” but in fact it was long forgotten. When the truce expired, during negotiations in 1554, Ivan IV demanded the return of arrears, the renunciation of the Livonian Confederation from military alliances with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Sweden, and the continuation of the truce.

The first payment of the debt for Dorpat was supposed to take place in 1557, but the Livonian Confederation did not fulfill its obligation.

In 1557, in the city of Posvol, an agreement was concluded between the Livonian Confederation and the Kingdom of Poland, establishing the vassal dependence of the order on Poland.

In the spring of 1557, Tsar Ivan IV established a port on the banks of Narva ( “The same year, July, a city was built from the German Ust-Narova River Rozsene by the sea as a shelter for sea ships.”). However, Livonia and the Hanseatic League do not allow European merchants to enter the new Russian port, and they are forced to go, as before, to Livonian ports.

Progress of the war

By the beginning of the war, the Livonian Confederation was weakened by defeat in the conflict with the Archbishop of Riga and Sigismund II Augustus. In addition, the already heterogeneous Livonian society was even more split as a result of the Reformation. On the other hand, Russia was gaining strength after the victories over the Kazan and Astrakhan khanates and the annexation of Kabarda.

War with the Livonian Confederation

Russia started the war on January 17, 1558. The invasion of Russian troops in January-February 1558 into the Livonian lands was a reconnaissance raid. 40 thousand people took part in it under the command of Khan Shig-Aley (Shah-Ali), governor Glinsky and Zakharyin-Yuryev. They walked through the eastern part of Estonia and returned back by the beginning of March. The Russian side motivated this campaign solely by the desire to receive due tribute from Livonia. The Livonian Landtag decided to collect 60 thousand thalers for settlements with Moscow in order to end the war that had begun. However, by May only half of the declared amount had been collected. In addition, the Narva garrison fired at the Ivangorod fortress, thereby violating the armistice agreement.

This time a more powerful army moved to Livonia. The Livonian Confederation at that time could put no more than 10 thousand in the field, not counting the fortress garrisons. Thus, its main military asset was the powerful stone walls of the fortresses, which by this time could no longer effectively withstand the power of heavy siege weapons.

Voivodes Alexey Basmanov and Danila Adashev arrived in Ivangorod. In April 1558, Russian troops besieged Narva. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the knight Vocht Schnellenberg. On May 11, a fire broke out in the city, accompanied by a storm (according to the Nikon Chronicle, the fire occurred due to the fact that drunken Livonians threw an Orthodox icon of the Mother of God into the fire). Taking advantage of the fact that the guards had left the city walls, the Russians rushed to storm. They broke through the gates and took possession of the lower city. Having captured the guns located there, the warriors turned them around and opened fire on the upper castle, preparing the stairs for the attack. However, by the evening the defenders of the castle themselves surrendered, on the condition of free exit from the city.

The defense of the Neuhausen fortress was particularly tenacious. It was defended by several hundred warriors led by the knight von Padenorm, who repelled the onslaught of the governor Peter Shuisky for almost a month. On June 30, 1558, after the destruction of the fortress walls and towers by Russian artillery, the Germans retreated to the upper castle. Von Padenorm expressed a desire to hold the defense here too, but the surviving defenders of the fortress refused to continue their pointless resistance. As a sign of respect for their courage, Pyotr Shuisky allowed them to leave the fortress with honor.

In July, P. Shuisky besieged Dorpat. The city was defended by a garrison of 2,000 men under the command of Bishop Hermann Weiland. Having built a rampart at the level of the fortress walls and installed guns on it, on July 11, Russian artillery began shelling the city. The cannonballs pierced the tiles of the roofs of houses, drowning the residents taking refuge there. On July 15, P. Shuisky invited Weiland to surrender. While he was thinking, the bombing continued. Some towers and loopholes were destroyed. Having lost hope of outside help, the besieged decided to enter into negotiations with the Russians. P. Shuisky promised not to destroy the city to the ground and to preserve the previous administration for its residents. On July 18, 1558 Dorpat capitulated. The troops settled in houses abandoned by residents. In one of them, warriors found 80 thousand thalers in a cache. The Livonian historian bitterly tells that the people of Dorpat, because of their greed, lost more than the Russian Tsar demanded from them. The funds found would be enough not only for the Yuryev tribute, but also for hiring troops to defend the Livonian Confederation.

During May-October 1558, Russian troops took 20 fortified cities, including those that voluntarily surrendered and entered into the citizenship of the Russian Tsar, after which they went into winter quarters within their borders, leaving small garrisons in the cities. The new energetic master Gotthard Ketler took advantage of this. Having collected 10 thousand. army, he decided to return what was lost. At the end of 1558, Ketler approached the Ringen fortress, which was defended by a garrison of several hundred archers under the command of the governor Rusin-Ignatiev. A detachment of governor Repnin (2 thousand people) went to help the besieged, but he was defeated by Ketler. However, the Russian garrison continued to defend the fortress for five weeks, and only when the defenders ran out of gunpowder were the Germans able to storm the fortress. The entire garrison was killed. Having lost a fifth of his army (2 thousand people) near Ringen and having spent more than a month besieging one fortress, Ketler was unable to build on his success. At the end of October 1558, his army retreated to Riga. This small victory turned into a big disaster for the Livonians.

In response to the actions of the Livonian Confederation, two months after the fall of the Ringen fortress, Russian troops carried out a winter raid, which was a punitive operation. In January 1559, Prince-voivode Serebryany at the head of his army entered Livonia. The Livonian army under the command of the knight Felkensam came out to meet him. On January 17, at the Battle of Terzen, the Germans suffered a complete defeat. Felkensam and 400 knights (not counting ordinary warriors) died in this battle, the rest were captured or fled. This victory opened the gates to Livonia wide for the Russians. They passed unhindered through the lands of the Livonian Confederation, captured 11 cities and reached Riga, where they burned the Riga fleet at the Dunamun raid. Then Courland passed along the path of the Russian army and, having passed through it, they reached the Prussian border. In February, the army returned home with huge booty and a large number of prisoners.

After the winter raid of 1559, Ivan IV granted the Livonian Confederation a truce (the third in a row) from March to November, without consolidating his success. This miscalculation was due to a number of reasons. Moscow was under serious pressure from Lithuania, Poland, Sweden and Denmark, who had their own plans for the Livonian lands. Since March 1559, Lithuanian ambassadors urgently demanded that Ivan IV stop hostilities in Livonia, threatening, otherwise, to take the side of the Livonian Confederation. Soon the Swedish and Danish ambassadors made requests to end the war.

With its invasion of Livonia, Russia also affected the trade interests of a number of European states. Trade on the Baltic Sea was then growing from year to year and the question of who would control it was relevant. Revel merchants, having lost the most important source of their profits - income from Russian transit, complained to the Swedish king: “ We stand on the walls and watch with tears as merchant ships sail past our city to the Russians in Narva».

In addition, the Russian presence in Livonia affected complex and confusing pan-European politics, upsetting the balance of power on the continent. So, for example, the Polish king Sigismund II Augustus wrote to the English Queen Elizabeth I about the importance of the Russians in Livonia: “ The Moscow sovereign daily increases his power by acquiring goods that are brought to Narva, because, among other things, weapons are brought here that are still unknown to him... military specialists arrive, through whom he acquires the means to defeat everyone...».

The truce was also due to disagreements over foreign strategy within the Russian leadership itself. There, in addition to supporters of access to the Baltic Sea, there were those who advocated continuing the struggle in the south, against the Crimean Khanate. In fact, the main initiator of the truce of 1559 was the okolnichy Alexei Adashev. This group reflected the sentiments of those circles of the nobility who, in addition to eliminating the threat from the steppes, wanted to receive a large additional land fund in the steppe zone. During this truce, the Russians attacked the Crimean Khanate, which, however, did not have significant consequences. The truce with Livonia had more global consequences.

Truce of 1559

Already in the first year of the war, in addition to Narva, Yuryev (July 18), Neishloss, Neuhaus were occupied, the troops of the Livonian Confederation were defeated at Thiersen near Riga, Russian troops reached Kolyvan. The raids of the Crimean Tatar hordes on the southern borders of Rus', which occurred already in January 1558, could not fetter the initiative of Russian troops in the Baltic states.

However, in March 1559, under the influence of Denmark and representatives of the large boyars, who prevented the expansion of the scope of the military conflict, a truce was concluded with the Livonian Confederation, which lasted until November. Historian R. G. Skrynnikov emphasizes that the Russian government, represented by Adashev and Viskovaty, “had to conclude a truce on the western borders,” as it was preparing for a “decisive clash on the southern border.”

During the truce (August 31), the Livonian Landmaster of the Teutonic Order, Gothard Ketler, concluded an agreement in Vilna with the Lithuanian Grand Duke Sigismund II, according to which the lands of the order and the possessions of the Riga Archbishop passed under “clientella and protection,” that is, under the protectorate of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In the same 1559, Revel went to Sweden, and the Bishop of Ezel ceded the island of Ezel (Saaremaa) to Duke Magnus, the brother of the Danish king, for 30 thousand thalers.

Taking advantage of the delay, the Livonian Confederation gathered reinforcements, and a month before the end of the truce in the vicinity of Yuriev, its troops attacked Russian troops. Russian governors lost more than 1000 people killed.

In 1560, the Russians resumed hostilities and won a number of victories: Marienburg (now Aluksne in Latvia) was taken; German forces were defeated at Ermes, after which Fellin (now Viljandi in Estonia) was taken. The Livonian Confederation collapsed.

During the capture of Fellin, the former Livonian landmaster of the Teutonic Order, Wilhelm von Furstenberg, was captured. In 1575, he sent his brother a letter from Yaroslavl, where the former landmaster had been granted land. He told a relative that he “has no reason to complain about his fate.”

Sweden and Lithuania, who acquired the Livonian lands, demanded that Moscow remove troops from their territory. Ivan the Terrible refused and Russia found itself in conflict with the coalition of Lithuania and Sweden.

War with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania

On November 26, 1561, the German Emperor Ferdinand I banned supplies to the Russians through the port of Narva. Eric XIV, King of Sweden, blocked the port of Narva and sent Swedish privateers to intercept merchant ships sailing to Narva.

In 1562, there was a raid by Lithuanian troops on the Smolensk and Velizh regions. In the summer of the same year, the situation on the southern borders of the Moscow state worsened, which moved the timing of the Russian offensive in Livonia to the fall.

The path to the Lithuanian capital Vilna was closed by Polotsk. In January 1563, the Russian army, which included “almost all the armed forces of the country,” set out to capture this border fortress from Velikie Luki. At the beginning of February, the Russian army began the siege of Polotsk, and on February 15 the city surrendered.

As the Pskov Chronicle reports, during the capture of Polotsk, Ivan the Terrible ordered all Jews to be baptized on the spot, and ordered those who refused (300 people) to be drowned in the Dvina. Karamzin mentions that after the capture of Polotsk, John ordered “all Jews to be baptized, and the disobedient to be drowned in Dvina.”

After the capture of Polotsk, there was a decline in Russia's successes in the Livonian War. Already in 1564, the Russians suffered a series of defeats (Battle of Chashniki). A boyar and a major military leader, who actually commanded the Russian troops in the West, Prince A. M. Kurbsky, went over to the side of Lithuania; he betrayed the king’s agents in the Baltic states to the king and participated in the Lithuanian raid on Velikiye Luki.

Tsar Ivan the Terrible responded to military failures and the reluctance of eminent boyars to fight against Lithuania with repressions against the boyars. In 1565 the oprichnina was introduced. In 1566, a Lithuanian embassy arrived in Moscow, proposing to divide Livonia on the basis of the situation existing at that time. The Zemsky Sobor, convened at this time, supported the intention of the government of Ivan the Terrible to fight in the Baltic states until the capture of Riga.

Third period of the war

The Union of Lublin, which in 1569 united the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania into one state - the Republic of Both Nations, had serious consequences. A difficult situation has developed in the north of Russia, where relations with Sweden have again become strained, and in the south (the campaign of the Turkish army near Astrakhan in 1569 and the war with Crimea, during which the army of Devlet I Giray burned Moscow in 1571 and devastated the southern Russian lands). However, the onset of a long-term “kinglessness” in the Republic of Both Nations, the creation in Livonia of the vassal “kingdom” of Magnus, which at first had an attractive force in the eyes of the population of Livonia, again made it possible to tip the scales in favor of Russia. In 1572, the army of Devlet-Girey was destroyed and the threat of large raids by the Crimean Tatars was eliminated (Battle of Molodi). In 1573, the Russians stormed the Weissenstein (Paide) fortress. In the spring, Moscow troops under the command of Prince Mstislavsky (16,000) met near Lode Castle in western Estland with a Swedish army of two thousand. Despite the overwhelming numerical advantage, the Russian troops suffered a crushing defeat. They had to leave all their guns, banners and convoys.

In 1575, the Sage fortress surrendered to the army of Magnus, and Pernov (now Pärnu in Estonia) surrendered to the Russians. After the campaign of 1576, Russia captured the entire coast except Riga and Kolyvan.

However, the unfavorable international situation, the distribution of land in the Baltic states to Russian nobles, which alienated the local peasant population from Russia, and serious internal difficulties (economic ruin looming over the country) negatively influenced the further course of the war for Russia.

Fourth period of the war

Stefan Batory, who, with the active support of the Turks (1576), ascended the throne of the Republic of the Crown of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, went on the offensive and occupied Wenden (1578), Polotsk (1579), Sokol, Velizh, Usvyat, Velikiye Luki. In the captured fortresses, the Poles and Lithuanians completely destroyed the Russian garrisons. In Velikiye Luki, the Poles exterminated the entire population, about 7 thousand people. Polish and Lithuanian troops ravaged the Smolensk region, the Seversk land, the Ryazan region, the southwest of the Novgorod region, and plundered Russian lands right up to the upper reaches of the Volga. The devastation they caused was reminiscent of the worst Tatar raids. The Lithuanian governor Philon Kmita from Orsha burned 2,000 villages in the western Russian lands and captured a huge town. Lithuanian magnates Ostrozhsky and Vishnevetsky, with the help of light cavalry units, plundered the Chernihiv region. The cavalry of the nobleman Jan Solomeretsky ravaged the outskirts of Yaroslavl. In February 1581, the Lithuanians burned Staraya Russa.

In 1581, the Polish-Lithuanian army, which included mercenaries from almost all of Europe, besieged Pskov, intending, if successful, to march on Novgorod the Great and Moscow. In November 1580, the Swedes took Korela, where 2 thousand Russians were exterminated, and in 1581 they occupied Rugodiv (Narva), which was also accompanied by massacres - 7 thousand Russians died; the victors did not take prisoners and did not spare civilians. The heroic defense of Pskov in 1581-1582 by the garrison and the population of the city determined a more favorable outcome of the war for Russia: the failure at Pskov forced Stefan Batory to enter into peace negotiations.

Results and consequences

In January 1582, in Yam-Zapolny (near Pskov) a 10-year truce was concluded with the Republic of Both Nations (Rzeczpospolita) (the so-called Peace of Yam-Zapolny). Russia renounced Livonia and Belarusian lands, but some border lands were returned to it.

In May 1583, the 3-year Truce of Plyus with Sweden was concluded, according to which Koporye, Yam, Ivangorod and the adjacent territory of the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland were ceded. The Russian state again found itself cut off from the sea. The country was devastated, and the northwestern regions were depopulated.

It should also be noted that the course of the war and its results were influenced by the Crimean raids: only for 3 years out of 25 years of the war there were no significant raids.

The article briefly talks about the Livonian War (1558-1583), which was waged by Ivan the Terrible for the right to access the Baltic Sea. The war for Russia was initially successful, but after Sweden, Denmark and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth entered it, it became protracted and ended in territorial losses.

1. Causes of the Livonian War
2. Progress of the Livonian War
3. Results of the Livonian War

Causes of the Livonian War

• Livonia was a state founded by the German knightly order in the 13th century. and included part of the territory of the modern Baltic states. By the 16th century it was a very weak state formation, the power in which was shared between knights and bishops. Livonia was easy prey for an aggressive state. Ivan the Terrible set himself the task of capturing Livonia in order to secure access to the Baltic Sea and in order to prevent its conquest by someone else. In addition, Livonia, being between Europe and Russia, in every possible way prevented the establishment of contacts between them, in particular, the entry of European masters into Russia was practically prohibited. This caused discontent in Moscow.
• The territory of Livonia before the capture by the German knights belonged to the Russian princes. This pushed Ivan the Terrible to war for the return of ancestral lands.
• According to the existing treaty, Livonia was obliged to pay Russia an annual tribute for the possession of the ancient Russian city of Yuryev (renamed Dorpat) and neighboring territories. However, this condition was not met, which was the main reason for the war.

Progress of the Livonian War

• In response to the refusal to pay tribute, Ivan the Terrible in 1558 began a war with Livonia. A weak state, torn by contradictions, cannot resist the huge army of Ivan the Terrible. The Russian army victoriously passes through the entire territory of Livonia, leaving only large fortresses and cities in the hands of the enemy. As a result, by 1560 Livonia, as a state, ceased to exist. However, its lands were divided between Sweden, Denmark and Poland, which declared that Russia must abandon all territorial acquisitions.
• The emergence of new opponents did not immediately affect the nature of the war. Sweden was at war with Denmark. Ivan the Terrible concentrated all his efforts against Poland. Successful military operations led to the capture of Polotsk in 1563. Poland begins to ask for a truce, and Ivan the Terrible convenes the Zemsky Sobor and addresses him with such a proposal. However, the cathedral responds with a sharp refusal, declaring that the capture of Livonia is necessary in economic terms. The war continues, it becomes clear that it will be protracted.
• The situation changes for the worse after Ivan the Terrible introduced the oprichnina. The state, already weakened during a tense war, receives a “royal gift.” The tsar's punitive and repressive measures lead to a decline in the economy; the executions of many prominent military leaders significantly weaken the army. At the same time, the Crimean Khanate intensified its actions, beginning to threaten Russia. In 1571, Moscow was burned by Khan Devlet-Girey.
• In 1569, Poland and Lithuania united into a new strong state - the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In 1575, Stefan Batory became its king, who later showed the qualities of a talented commander. This became a turning point in the Livonian War. The Russian army holds the territory of Livonia for some time, besieges Riga and Revel, but soon the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Sweden begin active military operations against the Russian army. Batory inflicts a series of defeats on Ivan the Terrible and wins back Polotsk. In 1581 he besieged Pskov, whose courageous defense lasted five months. Batory's lifting of the siege becomes the last victory of the Russian army. Sweden at this time seizes the coast of the Gulf of Finland, which belongs to Russia.
• In 1582, Ivan the Terrible concluded a truce with Stefan Batory, according to which he renounced all his territorial acquisitions. In 1583, a treaty was signed with Sweden, as a result of which the captured lands on the coast of the Gulf of Finland were assigned to it.

Results of the Livonian War

• The war started by Ivan the Terrible promised to be successful. At first, Russia made significant progress. However, due to a number of internal and external reasons, a turning point occurs in the war. Russia loses the captured territories and, ultimately, access to the Baltic Sea, remaining cut off from European markets.

The Livonian War lasted about 25 years, from 58 to 83. The conflict arose between the Russian Empire, Livonia, Sweden, Denmark and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which later became the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The fighting took place in the territories of modern Belarus, Northwestern Russia, Estonia and Latvia.

By the end of the 15th century, the foreign policy actions of Grand Duke Ivan III were aimed at fighting the Tatar Khan, who were besieging the southern and eastern lands, the Principality of Lithuania for the occupied territories, and Livonia for access to the Baltic Sea. At the same time, the results achieved in the confrontation with the Tatars led to the fact that in the middle of the 16th century the Russian kingdom restored military and political influence in the occupied territories and forced the Nogai and Siberian khans to bow down.

The issue of the seizure of Crimea remained relevant. At the same time, the opinions of the boyars were divided. And, although many spoke out for the conquest of the south, despite the vast southern expanses in which the steppes felt organically, and there were no Moscow strongholds, some of the boyars, led by the tsar, paid attention to access to the Baltic Sea. Since joint military operations against the Ottoman Empire, together with Poland and Lithuania, were associated with the loss of Ukrainian and Belarusian lands, Ivan the Terrible chose the fight against Livonia as the main direction of his foreign policy.

Causes of the conflict

By the middle of the 15th century, Livonia was a weakened confederation of the Livonian Order and bishoprics. The latter remained only a formal power, since the lands of the order accounted for 67% of the entire land of Livonia. Large cities had a certain autonomy and their own power. Thus, the state institution of Livonia was extremely fragmented. Due to military, political and economic weakening, the confederation had to conclude a truce with the Russian kingdom. The peace treaty, concluded for six years and extended in the 09th, 14th, 21st, 31st and 34th years of the sixteenth century, provided for the payment of the “Yuriev tribute”, the timing and amount of which is not mentioned in the sources. However, there is an opinion that the tribute was never paid. Yuriev, later renamed Darpt, was founded by Yaroslav the Wise. Tribute was supposed to be paid for it and the territory adjacent to the city. In addition, the alliance with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, formalized in 1954, included points directed against the power of the Russian Tsar. However, historians consider the debt for the “Yuriev tribute” to be more likely a reason, but not the final cause of the war.

Experts believe that the real reason for the military campaign against Livonia was the impossibility of developing trade relations with Western Europe due to the fact that the main ports of the Baltic Sea were under the control of Livonia.

The trade routes along which goods were delivered at that time were the White Sea (port of Arkhangelsk) and the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland. However, these sea routes, where merchant ships actively moved during the warm season, froze for a long time with the onset of cold weather. At the same time, it was impossible to conduct foreign trade activities.

Russian merchants, when conducting business on the ice-free Baltic Sea, had to resort to the services of intermediaries in the person of Germans from Narva and Dorpat, and this led to serious losses, since the import of the most valuable goods - gunpowder, iron, various metals - was led by “Livonians”, who could suspend deliveries. Without much-needed materials, the development of handicrafts in Rus' was impossible.

In addition to the economic justification, the beginning of the Livonian War is associated with an attempt to restore political ties with the West. Since, as a result of a long struggle against the Tatar-Mongol yoke and the redivision of territory, the country acquired an eastern orientation, it was important to defend the title of a Western state, conclude profitable marriage alliances, etc.

Another reason is the social aspect. The redistribution of the Baltic lands would lead to a strengthening of the power of the nobility and merchant class. The boyars were more inclined to seize the southern lands, due to their distance from the state and political center. There, at least at first, it was possible to use absolute power before the arrival of organized power.

The beginning of hostilities 58-61

The end of 1957 turned out to be the most favorable for the start of military operations against Livonia. The difficult situation in the alignment of European forces played into the hands of the Russian Tsar. Sweden's serious losses in the Russian-Swedish war led to the weakening of its most powerful enemy. The aggravation of relations with Sweden distracted the Danish government. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was not ready for serious international conflicts due to internal disagreements and social problems.

Historians conditionally divide the course of the Twenty-Five Years' War into three main stages:

The first advanced from 58 to 61 and was initially planned as a punitive operation of Ivan the Terrible with the aim of demonstrating military force;

The second ended in ’77, was protracted and nullified all diplomatic agreements reached before ’57;

At the third stage, the military actions of Russian troops were predominantly defensive in nature and led to the conclusion of a peace agreement on conditions that were absolutely unfavorable for Moscow.

Ivan the Terrible did not begin active military clashes until 1958. During this time, attempts were made to reach peace agreements regarding the surrender of Narva under Moscow influence. To which the Order expressed an unequivocal refusal. After which, in January 1558, a forty-thousand-strong army entered Livonian soil, destroying and ravaging cities and territories, and reached the Baltic coast.

During the campaign, Russian leaders several times sent proposals for peace to the Livonian authorities, which were accepted. However, in March 1958, supporters of the military forces of Livonia attempted to terminate the peace agreements by starting shelling of Ivangorod. Thus, a new military offensive of Russian troops in Livonia was provoked. During the offensive, more than twenty settlements and fortresses were destroyed. By the end of the summer of 1958, the forces of the Moscow Tsar ravaged the environs of Riga and Revel.

By March 1959, the Russians had occupied stable positions, which led to the conclusion of peace, which ended in November 1959. Over the past six months, the Livonian forces received support and reinforcements from Sweden and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. However, attempts to storm Yuryev and Lais ended in failure for the Livonians. By August 1960, Russian troops occupied the strongest fortresses of Fellin and Marienburg.

Second stage of the war

Successes during military operations put Ivan the Terrible in a difficult position. The reason for this was the formation of a coalition represented by the Roman Empire, Sweden and Denmark against Russia and the statement of claims by Poland and Lithuania regarding the cession of Baltic lands. Variable victories and defeats of the Russian army during the year 62 led to the fact that the war began to take on a protracted character.

Failures in attempts to conclude diplomatic agreements, illiterate actions of military leaders and changes in policy within the state led to an aggravation of the social and economic situation.

Third stage

In 75, Stefan Batory became king of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and began active military operations against Russia. In addition, the turbulent situation in the northern lands is due to the Swedish attack. Batory's troops were not deployed towards plundered Livonia, but to the Northern and Smolensk lands. After the capture of Polotsk, its siege lasted only three weeks, and the devastation of the Northern lands, Batory put forward demands to leave Livonia and cede the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Courland. At the end of August 1980, the Great Luki Garden began, ending in complete defeat on September 5th. After which the fortresses of Narva, Ozerishche and Zavolochye were taken.

The attempt to capture Pskov at the end of June 1981 for Batory’s troops was unsuccessful, since the Russian military promptly responded to the reinforcement and preparation of the enemy. As a result of a long siege and many attempts to storm the fortress, the Polish-Lithuanian troops were forced to retreat.

The result of the twenty-five-year war was a severe defeat for Russia. Attempts to seize the Baltic states and conduct free trade in the Baltic Sea were unsuccessful, in addition, power over previously assigned territories was lost.

The events of the Livonian War are a classic example of Europe’s reluctance to let the Russian state into the world political and economic arena. The confrontation between Russia and European states, which, by the way, continues to this day, did not begin suddenly. This confrontation goes back centuries and there are many reasons for it. Although the main one is competition. At first it was a spiritual competition - the struggle of the shepherds of the Christian church for the flock, and, incidentally, for the territorial possessions of this flock. So, the events of the Livonian War of the 16th century are echoes of the struggle waged between the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches.

The first Russian Tsar declared war on the Livonian Order in 1558. The official reason was the fact that the Livonians had already 50 years stopped paying tribute for the possession of the city of Dorpat, which they captured back in the 13th century. In addition, the Livonians did not want to allow specialists and craftsmen from German states to enter Muscovy. The military campaign began in 1558 and lasted until 1583 and was called the Livonian War in World History.

Three periods of the Livonian War

The events of the Livonian War have three periods, which occurred with varying success for Tsar Ivan the Terrible. The first period is 1558 - 1563. Russian troops carried out successful military operations, which in 1561 led to the defeat of the Livonian Order. Russian troops captured the cities of Narva and Dorpat. They came close to Riga and Tallinn. The last successful operation for the Russian troops was the capture of Polotsk - this happened in 1563. The Livonian War became protracted, which was facilitated by the internal problems of the Moscow state.

The second period of the Livonian War lasts from 1563 to 1578. Denmark, Sweden, Poland and Lithuania united against the troops of the Russian Tsar. Each pursuing its own goal in the war with Muscovy, these northern European states pursued a common goal - not to allow the Russian state to join the number of European states that lay claim to a dominant position. The Moscow state should not have returned those European territories that belonged to it during the times of Kievan Rus and were lost during internecine and feudal disputes and wars of conquest. The situation in the Livonian War was complicated for the Russian troops by the economic weakness of the Moscow state, which during this period was experiencing a period of ruin. The ruin and bleeding of an already not very rich country occurred as a result of the oprichnina, which turned out to be an enemy no less bloodthirsty and cruel than the Livonian Order. A prominent Russian military leader, a member of the Chosen Council of Ivan the Terrible, his friend and associate, thrust the knife of betrayal into the back of his sovereign, as well as into the back of his country. Kurbsky in 1563 went over to the side of King Sigismund and participated in military operations against Russian troops. He knew many of the military plans of the Russian Tsar, which he did not fail to report to his former enemies. In addition, Lithuania and Poland united in 1569 into a single state - the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

The third period of the Lithuanian War takes place from 1579 to 1583. This is a period of defensive battles waged by the Russians against the combined forces of the enemy. As a result, the Moscow state lost Polotsk in 1579, and Velikiye Luki in 1581. In August 1581, the Polish king Stefan Batory began a siege of the city of Pskov, in which Kurbsky also participated. The truly heroic siege lasted almost six months, but the invading troops never entered the city. The Polish king and the Russian Tsar signed the Yampol Peace Treaty in January 1582. The Russian state lost not only the Baltic lands and many original Russian cities, but also did not gain access to the Baltic Sea. The main task of the Livonian War was not solved.

I strongly welcome you! Klim Sanych, good afternoon. Good afternoon. Hi all. Happy birthday! Thank you. Hello! It is important. You can take the rest yourself. Yes. What is today about? With all these terrible cinematic creations that the domestic film industry has poured on us in a flurry, as well as with the regular reaction to current events, as well as with all sorts of decent films that we also constantly analyze, we have completely forgotten about the basis, namely military history. I’m still a military historian, I’m yearning, I want to talk about the war. And not an expert on shit like “The Shape of Water,” damn it. Yes. Which we are forced to do in order to get hype. Yes, yes, of course, of course, of course. Yes, so, we have the Livonian War, which in some way marks the anniversary of its beginning this year. It started in 1558, and now it is 2018, i.e. we get an even date, and there is no reason not to analyze this significant event, especially since it is so promoted in history textbooks. Judging by the name, we were at war with some Livonia? Yes Yes Yes. But this is actually a big misconception. Everyone thinks that the Livonian War means that we fought with Livonia, so. And today I propose to give some kind of introduction, because the Livonian War is a very long, very large (as they would say now, stupid term) geopolitical conflict. So-so. And I think it’s impossible to immediately begin military action; we need to take a well-funded approach. Those. first, figure out what was happening there in general around this very Livonia and not only, and only then, step by step, analyze the course of military operations, all sorts of wonderful battles that took place there, especially since we have already sorted out one of them - the Capture of Polotsk. Can we do it in 1 video? Nain! Only a few. So-so. And then I immediately say that for now, as a start, as things go, we will only analyze the Livonian War itself, because, but I’m getting a little ahead of myself. And we need to start with periodization, firstly, and secondly, with what the term is, what the Livonian War actually was. Because, as you rightly said, the Livonian War means it is with the Livonians. And we know from school that this was a very important conflict that tore apart the Moscow kingdom of Ivan the Terrible, which is why the Troubles immediately began. Because they spent all the money there, they killed all the military men there, and those who were not killed became poor, everyone became brutal because of this Livonian War, we lost it in the end, and then Ivan the Terrible died suddenly, and it happened... From anger. From anger, from rage, yes, from bedsores. And the Troubles began, and everything was bad as a result. Well, it logically turns out that the Livonian War was the main war waged by Russia during the time of Ivan the Terrible. Well, since they lost it and everything is bad, that means it is so. But it is not so. But I’m sorry, I’ll interrupt you, because as usual they will start asking questions, but due to my illiteracy, I know exactly one author, citizen Skrynnikov. Yes. Are his books under Ivan the Terrible good? Well, you definitely need to know them, because Skrynnikov dug deep. We send everyone - ZhZL, the life of wonderful people, author Skrynnikov, I don’t remember the name. Ruslan Grigorievich. Ruslan Grigorievich. The book is called “Ivan the Terrible”. And there are a number of others. In fact, of course, there are many more books about Ivan the Terrible, not only Skrynnikov, but we will definitely give a list of recommended literature, as we usually do when analyzing historical topics. But about the Livonian War, it would seem, the most important war of Ivan the Terrible, and until recently there were no special books about it at all. Why? Those. Of course, they wrote about her in various books, sometimes quite a lot. And if you collect them in heaps, all these books, then you will get some kind of incredible historiographical background. And now they have just begun to write, by and large, about the Livonian War personally. It’s hard to say why, I don’t know why. That is... They don’t want to highlight Ivan’s merits? I don't know, it's a mystery. I just think that it’s impossible to do everything in a row, and the Livonian War is such a gigantic tangle that you can’t tackle it on the fly, so we think - well, for us, well, okay, later. Here. And then someone else says “later.” In the meantime, about repression. In the meantime, of course, let’s talk about repression, yes. But the stable historiographical term “Livonian War” nevertheless emerged, although, of course, if contemporaries had learned that they were participating in the Livonian War, they would have been very surprised. Much like the French and the British, having learned that they were fighting in the Hundred Years' War. Because the Livonian War dates back to 1558, and it is traditionally believed that it dates back to 1583 until the Truce of Plus with Sweden. In reality, of course, this is not entirely true. And now I’ll try to explain why. Because the Livonian War did not exist as such, it was a series of interconnected conflicts, albeit thematically, but which each fought off each other both by the participating countries, and by specific peace treaties, specific declarations of war. It was a protracted conflict between the parties, in which not only Russia and Livonia participated, this is the most important thing, Livonia almost did not participate there at all. Lithuanians, Poles, Swedes, Danes, Russia, of course, a little Livonia took part there, and even the Tatars managed to participate directly and indirectly. And the whole reason is because Livonia, i.e. Livonian Confederation, so-called The Livonian Order was, by the end of the 15th and already in the 16th century, even more of a sick man in Europe, as the Ottoman Empire later became in the 19th century. This was a naturally sick man of Europe. This was due to something – well, in general, of course, with the crisis of the order’s state. This was the last order state of all that there were, probably, except for the knights of the Order of Ivan of Jerusalem, the Hospitallers in Malta. The fact is that the top-level organizations protecting them, namely the states that one way or another formed these same orders, were not up to it in the 16th century. In particular, the Livonian Confederation was a vassal of the Holy Roman Emperor of the German nation. But, as it turned out, the emperor was the first to leak it. Moreover, there were such seemingly impossible moments when the former Teutonic Order, which at that time had already become simply Prussia, fought on the side of the Poles and Lithuanians against Livonia. Those. this is generally one whole thing, but it was literally in the 15th century. Those. The Teutonic Order, it was like the commander of the Livonian Landmaster, it was one whole, between them there was Lithuania and they tried to unite. But, nevertheless, here we see how the Prussian Duke Albrecht, together with the Poles and Lithuanians, withdraws his troops to the border with Livonia. Because even the Prussians also looked in that direction. And why did they look - well, it’s easy to guess that this part of the Baltic coast was a very important trading point, because there are such wonderful cities as Tallinn... the Danish fortress. Danish fortress, also known as Revel. Riga is there. And all these cities cover almost all of Russian Baltic trade. And Russian Baltic trade, who hasn’t heard our last year’s videos about the milestones of Russian history, Baltic trade is very important, because Baltic trade is what covers all, almost all, Eurasian trade. That is, everything that goes along the Volga from the Caspian Sea; everything that comes through the Dnieper from the Black Sea; everything that goes along what was previously called the Great Silk Road is one way or another distributed among different, as they now say, hubs. That is, to the Mediterranean Sea in one direction, and in the other direction, the only sea route there is the Baltic, everything comes to the Baltic. And whoever is at the distribution point will inevitably receive a lot of money. Because the Baltic, as you might guess, is the northern Mediterranean Sea, because it is located among the lands - on one side there is Scandinavia, Denmark closes everything and, therefore, the German Baltic coast. And the Swedes just wanted to make it their inland sea. Yes. And even for a moment they succeeded. By the time of the Kalmar Union of the 14th century, when Denmark, Sweden and Norway were practically united, then it all, of course, fell apart, and by the time of the reign of Charles XII at the beginning of the 18th century, and, in fact, under his dad, under Charles XI, this is already the end of the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich - the beginning of the reign of Peter I, for some time this was also practically the Swedish inland sea, practically. Well, not only the Swedes wanted to make it an inland sea. That is, it is clear that neither Germany nor anyone else would have been able to make it internal, but they really wanted to crush the entire coastline. And whoever wanted it was Lithuania, of course, it has direct access to the Baltic Sea, and it needed the entire piece of the Baltic states to be its own. Naturally, Poland, as friends of the Lithuanians, since the Union of Krevo in the 14th century, is also a union state. Naturally, I have already mentioned Germany through Prussia; Denmark, because at one time the Danes sold their Danish fortress of Daalina, along with the knights who settled there, to the Livonians. And now, well, the Livonians are dying, so we need to take it back, this is a Danish fortress, even the name is like that, look. Here, first of all. Secondly, of course, the Danes could not allow the Swedes to strengthen themselves at this expense, because the Swedes are their direct competitors from all sides for many, many centuries. And, of course, Russia because the Livonian Order was constantly in close, I would say even dialectical, relationship with the northwestern lands of Rus', that is, Novgorod and Pskov. And, of course, everything was brewed not under Ivan the Terrible, everything was brewed under Ivan III. Those. it, of course, brewed much earlier, but this is the story that is directly adjacent to ours, to the Livonian War, it all began under the grandfather of Ivan IV, under Ivan the Great, under Ivan III. At this time, the Livonian Order was already feeling unwell, the Livonian Confederation. Well, firstly, because it is a confederation. Not a single confederal state of small size, surrounded by generally quite strong neighbors, will last long, because, as we remember, what Livonia is - Livonia is actually the territory of the order, that is, military-monastic, these are several bishoprics, which, it would seem, are included into one confederation, but they, as a rule, pursued their own very independent policy, sometimes directly conflicted within themselves, leading to armed clashes. Wow, some bishop inside the state said, “I don’t like everything,” and went to fight with his president. They entered into direct agreements with the enemies of the order, where they periodically had to be arrested, these bishops, if they could, of course. Well, of the bishoprics, the main role was played by the two largest ones: Terpskoye (on the site of the old Russian city of Yuryev) and Rizhskoye. Riga is the oldest city in Livonia, founded in 1202 by Bishop Albrecht. And unfortunately for the Livonians, and to great happiness for everyone else, the last master, Walter von Plettenberg, I don’t mean the last master of the Livonian Order, but the last such successful master who acted as an independent figure, such a bright independent figure, he was , firstly, a very energetic person, an extremely successful military leader and a very skillful military leader, frankly speaking, even Ivan III cried with him. Although where is this Livonia of this size and, therefore, the nascent kingdom of Moscow of this size. He beat us regularly. Due to his charisma and powerful organizational abilities, he fixed this confederal state, i.e. Through Lithuania, the Teutonic Order, which was also not doing well, was able to transform itself in the 16th century, becoming a secular state. He brought himself under the roof of the Poles and, in general, survived well. But the Livonians are not, the Livonians are fixed in the old medieval form. Of course, Plettenberg had reason to do so - why, because Livonia was a point where all sorts of fools and parasites, alcoholics and other downshifters were brought together. Like Finland for the Swedes. Yes Yes Yes. But downshifters went there with a specific goal - to undownshift back, because there, again, there are great prospects. And, naturally, fraternities immediately formed there, because just to come to the Livonian Order and say that I’m here too, excuse me, a knight, I’ll fight here for a little while, of course, it was possible, and even you would have been allowed to fight, but They wouldn’t give you anything to earn money there - no land, no money, well, except for the fact that you will directly fight. People were exiled there, as I once told you when we were talking about the short Livonian-Novgorod war in the 40s of the 15th century, people from the Rhine and Westphalia were exiled there. So they trampled this path, naturally formed a community there, and did not let anyone else in, well, at least on an industrial scale. Well, then the Danes allowed in another constellation of independent Danish knights, who were simply surrendered along with Tallinn, who saw both the Westafalians and the Rhineans in the coffin, but loved themselves. This, of course, added strength to this state. Well, based on this, a crisis broke out, because Walter von Plettenberg died, and there was no longer such a boss - energetic, charismatic, etc., who simply with his personality could weld it all together. Because in fact, expecting that everyone will be such a wonderful boss is quite stupid, this does not happen. And the system itself was practically no longer viable. Well, of course, everyone immediately became interested in the fact that if it all dies, and it is dying before our eyes, someone lucky will take it first, so everyone immediately pricked up their hairy ears and began to look closely to see who would just rush there first. Walter von Plettenberg, it must be said, although he defeated Russian troops several times, he never, as a sober person, thought that this could be done on a permanent basis. He understood perfectly well that he could beat the Russians only because Ivan III was fighting with Casemir IV of Lithuania. He’s just very busy, he can’t really deal with all this, he doesn’t have time. Therefore, when the Lithuanians and Poles invited Walter von Plettenberg to form a single anti-Russian coalition, he nobly refused, saying that nothing good would come of this for me. You may not survive this. Let's do it ourselves. I won't survive this. Yes, and, of course, there was a very strong pro-Russian party in the order, and a strong, of course, anti-Russian party, i.e. hawks and doves of peace. Doves of peace, as a rule, were associated directly with trading circles, which just needed to trade, that's all, period. And the hawks needed to impose some kind of their will, well, this is a militarized state, it was necessary to expand somehow, at least in a commercial sense. Naturally, they were in conflict with Sweden, because Sweden is another point with which Russia borders, through which we can sell or buy something, vice versa. And after Walter von Plettenberg, Master von der Recke, he issued a certain decree, where it was once again written what goods could be traded with Russia. This is a potential military enemy, so strategic goods have not been allowed to come to us on an ongoing basis since the 13th century. Here von der Recke once again wrote what exactly should not be missed. But you cannot miss gold, silver, tin, lead, iron, horses, armor and weapons. Sanctions were imposed against us. Well, because silver is money, everyone knew perfectly well that Rus' doesn’t have its own silver, we don’t have our own lead, we don’t have our own tin, well, there’s not enough tin at all. It needs to be specially developed, extracted from ores, they didn’t know how to do this back then, it just needs to be native, and this is a big problem. Only when Varlam Shalamov appeared, he was sent to develop tin. Yes Yes. Those. there will be no silver - there will be no money, there will be no tin - there will be no bronze, there will be no bronze - there will be no guns. Well, if there is no lead, there will be nothing to make bullets from. Well, everything about armor and weapons is clear there, they have a specific military purpose, horses are the same. Everyone knew very well that the horse population in Rus' was weak. Those. It is simply impossible to arm mass cavalry with good horses. Therefore, we cannot supply horses. And the traders wanted to supply because it was a lot of money, that’s all, through this there was a constant conflict. The German traders who tried first were not from the Livonian Confederation; they were regularly caught here. For example, it was already after Ivan III, it was under Vasily III, they caught a certain Dutch merchant, who, as it turned out, was not the first time bringing ships full of tin and herring to the Novgorodians. He was caught and fined, and sent to hell, this in 1530. Back in the 15th century, a German merchant who regularly transported iron and weapons to Rus' was eventually caught, arrested, fined, everything taken away and thrown out. And he took it again, because apparently it was very profitable. And so they caught him a second time and cut off his head. No, well, since there were such decrees all the time, it means that someone was constantly trying to smuggle and successfully carried it. On the other hand, the Novgorodians and Pskovites could not pass by the order’s possessions on the sea route. The sea route of the Middle Ages was a coastal route. Along the shore. Along the coast, firstly. Secondly, even if it is not along the coast, a serious port in which a serious fleet is stationed has the ability to intercept other people’s ships at a fairly large distance from its own base. Those. They put up some patrols. Yes sir. Those. you are sailing somewhere to trade, you should rest with us. - Oh no. - Still, rest. With all due respect. With all due respect, yes. Immediately the customs office comes to you and asks what you have. Well, they say - listen, but we, by the way, signed an agreement 150 years ago, you can only trade with us. You seem to be from Novgorod, well, apparently, yes, you will be trading here. Well, that’s it, you have to trade in Riga or Tallinn. Those. You won’t be able to sail past Riga and Tallinn. Maybe you will be able to slip past one of the cities, but somewhere you will definitely fall completely. I don’t walk past Tallinn and Riga without jokes. Yes. So. Once again I’m surprised how my ancestors always seem to be somehow narrow-minded and unreasonable, and then come on – there’s a port, and patrols, and interception, and customs. And sanctions. And you can only trade here, where the money is, damn it. Yes. Therefore, the Novgorodians, starting from the 12th century, simply could not sail anywhere, they received guests at home. Ours, of course, responded with all their love. Complete reciprocity. Complete reciprocity. Those. Here comes a German from Livonia, you will trade only in a German courtyard with specially designated merchants. 3 people will come to you, and you will trade with them. The prices are like this, the volumes are like this. Yes of course. You cannot engage in retail trade yourself, and you cannot engage in purchasing yourself. Again, if you want procurement, here are the guys with licenses. Hans and Friedrich. Yes, no, these are Russians Vanya and Petya. So you, Hans and Friedrich, will buy from them what you wanted to buy there, by the way. Here. It is clear that all this was handled by special trading corporations. For example, our entire northern trade has been covered by fur since the 13th century. Ivanova hundred, Ivanova 100 in Novgorod, one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, trading corporation. Because fur was a strategic commodity, which was actually a real currency. And so you could only buy fur from Ivanov 100. You couldn’t go to this Ugra yourself, to Biarmia, where the fur actually came from. The Germans, of course, tried to sail around the Kola Peninsula, around Arkhangelsk, but this is too far, the ice conditions there are not good. Well, in general, you can’t climb there on a regular basis. Since the early Middle Ages, since Viking times, there is a well-known saga about how people rode there, to Biarmia. Accordingly, if you want to travel to Novgorod, you will hire only Novgorod pilots. There were pilots on special duty there, then these same barge haulers who dragged the ships through the portages, but please don’t bring your own. If you brought it, let them rest here for now. They'll wait. They'll wait. Well, or as a guest they will go to Novgorod, where they will leave their money in a brothel, in a tavern somewhere. You can't work. And in such a situation, Ivan III annexed Novgorod. And then they wonder where the war comes from. How else can this issue be resolved, why do you have all the money and not us? Yes. In such a situation, Ivan III finally accepted this Novgorod back into the fold of the Russian state with open arms - enough for a walk. You have been free since 1136, something is not going well for you, come with us, here. Novgorod was besieged, they gave everyone a slap, and Novgorod became the site of a very broad social experiment, as we would put it now, namely, 2,600 Moscow nobles, the children of the boyars, were resettled to Novgorod, and land was opened up for them there. Actually, regular local layout begins from Novgorod, i.e. These very children of the boyars, nobles, turned in the full sense of the word into landowners, i.e. into knights, obligated to feudal service for the conditional holding of land and peasants. And from Novgorod, accordingly, certain nobles were evicted to other places so that they wouldn’t really organize... Groups there. Groupings, yes, so precisely that they would not be very comfortable. True, of course, it must be said that the Muscovites, when we found ourselves in Novgorod, themselves organized a grouping, they immediately made friends with the Novgorodians, they all formed their own kublo. Novgorod, as you know, had to be brought back to life several more times, and the last time this was done by Ivan the Terrible. Most successful. Well, Ivan III also did it very successfully, it’s just that Ivan IV did it for the last time and completely. By the way, he had to extinguish then, when they say that he extinguished the Novgorodians, he extinguished the descendants of Muscovites, whom his grandfather settled there. It was they who, in general, organized some initiatives there, which then had to be dealt with somehow. It is their rotten devils that are muddying the waters in the pond. Yes Yes Yes. Well, we’ve already talked about the uprising, and we’ll probably need to talk separately about the war for now. Ivan III took over Novgorod, and suddenly it turned out that this Livonian Confederation was a very dialectical neighbor. That is, on the one hand, it directly harms, but it simply directly harms. On the other hand, they have been negotiating with him for 150 years, and it is possible to coexist. But if you keep the Livonians in this loose form, they are a magnificent limitrophe as a counterweight to the Lithuanians. Those. No one even thought about conquering it. Of course, there were also very specific territorial claims, especially locally, where in general, apparently, this war was either a trade war, or a small war of partisan sabotage groups, small detachments, and it very rarely stopped. But in a global sense, no one needs to conquer them. For what? You can give money and they will fight against the Lithuanians. This is much cheaper than raising your own troops. Certainly. And if you conquer them, you will have to protect them, these territories. Well, this is really a huge territory, there are a lot of buildings there, they will need to be maintained, guarded, defended against the Lithuanians, the front will immediately lengthen. Therefore, for some time, for a very long time, no one thought about resolving the issue with the Livonians completely. On the contrary, they tried to keep them in this state, in a state of eternal semi-chaos, for as long as possible. And here, of course, you need to look in two directions at once, namely towards the Lithuanian and Polish and towards the Crimean. Because the Lithuanians, especially when they became close friends with the Poles, generally became at some point the dominant force in the region. Actually, only Ivan III and Vasily III were able to successfully resist them on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, the Poles have just dealt with the Teutonic Order, i.e., as it is correct to say, with the German Order. By the way, do you remember that you once asked me why the Teutonic Order, although all the Teutons have been around for a long time? Mari also cut them off, yes. So, it really just turned out that I never even thought about this question. You know that the word Germany is spelled Deutsch, i.e. Deutsch. And earlier, in the Middle Ages, it was written through T. Teutsch. Toych. Teutsch. So it turns out Teut, this is the German Order. Teutonic means Germanic, Teutonic simply means Germanic. Teut, or Teut, like that. Interesting. So, the Poles dealt with the Teutonic Order and had very specific intentions to deal with the Livonian Order too. But they also needed a limitrophe, i.e. someone who will create some kind of counterbalance to Russia in the North-West. State-laying. Yes Yes Yes. And therefore they constantly tried to bring the confederation under some kind of agreement, which would imply either an armed alliance against Russia, or at least armed neutrality against Russia. Those. if we are at war with Russia, you are either obliged to send troops, or you are obliged to look approvingly at our actions, and, accordingly, to comply with certain trade sanctions there. Yes. This was the same thing that Ivan III sought, only from the other side. Well, Ivan III began to successfully fight the Lithuanians, with Casimir IV. Subsequently, his policy was continued very successfully by Vasily III. Those. we remember this war of the early 16th century, which ended with the Battle of Vedrosh, we remember the first Smolensk War of 1512-1522, when in 1514 Vasily III captured Smolensk on the 3rd attempt. After which we lost the battle of Orsha, which, in general, did not lead to anything; we left the town for ourselves until the Time of Troubles. And Ivan III walked so widely for only one reason: he brought Kazan under his hand. Those. He did not actually capture Kazan, i.e. yes, there was a successful military enterprise there, Kazan actually submitted to it, it became a friendly state. And he was friends with the Krymchaks, namely with the founder of Giray Mengli-Girai I. In this case, you can be friends only for one reason, when there is someone to be friends against, because the Krymchaks hated the Great Horde, centered in modern Astrakhan. Because the Astrakhan people, as the heirs of the Jochi ulus, quite seriously believed that the Kazan people, the Crimeans, and the Nagais owed everything to them, i.e. they should be at their fingertips, this is our everything. But neither the Nagais, nor the Kazan, nor the Crimeans categorically disagreed with this, i.e. at all. Well, that is. All this meant that money had to be paid, but no one wanted to pay money, they needed it themselves. Firstly, pay money, and secondly, if those in Astrakhan come up with something, go somewhere to fight. But the Crimeans, for example, were not at all interested in fighting for the Astrakhan people; the Crimeans have an excellent position. On the one hand, they are located on the Black Sea and from this Crimea they can trade with anyone - slaves in the first place. And secondly, instead of running somewhere to Derbent, waving a saber there for some unknown purpose, it is much easier to run either to Moscow or to Vilna, catch men and women there and sell them in Kaffa. Here. And because The Great Horde at that time was a serious force, whatever one may say, although Ivan III seemed to have repulsed them there and on the Ugra, they still had to be reckoned with, and everyone, it was a very dangerous enemy if you quarreled with him. So, Mengli-Girai and Ivan III were friends against the Great Horde. And Ivan III constantly skillfully allowed his sidekick Mengli-Girai to enter Podolia, i.e. the southwestern lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, so that he could work there, as the Germans say, this is the very thing, raub und moert, i.e. he robbed and killed, he was an excellent specialist in this regard, he robbed and killed. Lock the floors, there will be robberies now. Yes sir. True, of course, it must be said that Ivan III extremely cleverly allowed his Muslim sidekick into his own Orthodox lands. Well done. Because, of course, Mengli Giray would like to get to the Lithuanian lands, but it’s very far away. Actually, where ethnic Lithuanians live. But here you don’t need to think very badly about Ivan III, he was simply a man of the feudal era, for him his own were those who were his subjects, i.e. who pays him taxes and owes vassalage. And the people of Kiev, for example, owed vassal service to the Lithuanians, so excuse me. Nobody gave a damn what their nationality and specifically religion were. Nobody cares. Yes. No, of course, in this way, again, according to medieval customs, for example, the people of Kiev or Chernigov, the Novgorod-Severtsy people were made to understand that look, while you are with these Lithuanian idiots, you will be robbed. And if you are with us, you will not be robbed. This is what everyone did throughout the Middle Ages. For example, the civilized Edward III Plantagenet went to war with France. The first thing he did, having won the Battle of Sluys there, which allowed him to land an army (naval battle), which allowed him to land an army on French territory, he took up the well-known practice of grandes voyages, i.e. long walks, i.e. just bandit raids across French territory with burned villages and kidnapped people. The title of the idiotic film, in my opinion, with Louis de Funes, “The Great Walk”, is it just about this, or what? Yes, somehow it was different, it wasn’t grandes voyages, the allusion is clear that there are these same 3 Englishmen walking around France, that’s what it is, grandes voyages. Damn deep. Here. This is a hint that is generally understood by people who have read a school history textbook in France and England. And lo and behold, civilized people were doing exactly the same thing at about the same time. I’m already silent about what they did when there were religious wars between Catholics and Huguenots inside France, the same thing. And this is literally at the same time that we will talk about, the mid-second half of the 16th century. Nothing got in the way. Although these are not just Catholics and Huguenots, this is just one country, France, within itself, they did such things there that Ivan IV would seem like a funny guy with a beard, in some kind of ridiculous golden robe, here. And they are all so sophisticated, so they did absolutely terrible things to each other in tights and codpieces. We will talk about this, I hope, later. Necessarily. I want, when we talk, in fact, about the military actions of the Livonian War, to talk about the parallel process that took place in Europe, in fact, and dwell on the wonderful battle of Dreux. Who beat whom there? The French are the French. Here. To the side, to the Crimeans again. The Crimeans were friends with Ivan III and greatly interfered with the Lithuanians, so Ivan III simply had a free hand, he could engage in Western expansion on an ongoing basis, take back the lands of the Rurikovichs, because he himself was Rurikovich, and on full grounds believed that he had the right for the entire inheritance of the Rurikovichs. Vasily III did the same thing, but he quarreled with the Girays, and specifically with Muhammad-Girai. And he quarreled for one simple reason, because the entire alliance with Mengli-Girai was actually built on sand. As soon as we looked towards the Volga and we became the enemy of the Great Horde, the Krymchaks no longer needed to be friends with us, because if we deal with the Great Horde directly, then the Krymchaks have a free hand, on the one hand. On the other hand, Crimea is a vassal territory of the Ottoman Empire, which the Ottoman Empire influenced very, very strongly. They could have given some order, because the most important interests on the Volga were, of course, not the Great Horde, despite all the remnants of its power. It was with a new player, namely the Ottoman Empire, which sought to crush all Muslim lands under itself either directly or indirectly. And under Vasily III in 1522, Muhammad-Girai sent him a letter demanding tribute. And Vasily III, of course, refuses, because for what reason? Well, Muhammad-Giray reaches Moscow, crosses the Oka River, smashes the army of Vasily III to smithereens, Vasily III flees Moscow, leaving the baptized Tatar Peter in Moscow to steer instead of Luzhkov. He himself escapes to Novgorod, Peter is forced to give him on behalf of the Tsar, Muhammad-Girai, a letter stating that the Moscow Tsar is a tributary of the Crimean Tsar. Strongly. Here. The outskirts of Moscow have been burned, the Tatars are walking on Vorobyovy Gory in Tsarskoe Selo. There was one of the villages that belonged to the king personally, they plundered everything there. And after that we could not fight normally with the Lithuanians simply because we had a multi-pound Crimean cannonball hanging on our leg. And here you need to understand a very important thing, who fought with the Lithuanians. People of the future Novgorod category, i.e., were in constant contact with the Lithuanians. those who were just sitting here in Novgorod, Pskov, this is approximately 1/6 of our entire cavalry, it was the 2nd most powerful territorial such point, after Moscow, of course. Moreover, in contrast to Moscow, Novgorod, the future Novgorod rank, as we would say, the general government, probably could be designated this way. It was never divided territorially; it was one integral territorial border division. Moscow never acted as some kind of unified whole, because they could transfer part of the cities for warfare and organizational and accounting activities to their neighbors, take them for themselves, in short, it all transformed like this all the time. The Novgorodians remained in the monolith all the time. Because of this, they had a very powerful merged corporation, which had a very strong tradition of local feudal corporate self-government. And when fighting, for example, with the Lithuanians or the Livonians, they, firstly, defended their own interests, because they were on the border, they defended their lands, or they could take something for themselves. Those. receive a visible material profit for yourself or your family. Well, if they do slap you, it happens, then at least the children won’t lose out, because you’ll take someone’s land and slaughter it for yourself. Or you will take the men away and settle them with you. But from then on, every year they constantly had to leave for the Oka border on the river to fight with the Crimeans. And there was no profit in fighting the Crimeans. Because what are Crimeans? The Krymchaks appear incomprehensibly when, and without declaring a light war, having gathered... Murzas, lancers and Tatar Cossacks, they simply ran in by decision of some local regional commander, and they had to be caught. There were constant fights, maybe not very big, but extremely fierce. And here we have, from 1522 until the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich, we have this Oka, then the Belgorod border, it never died down, service was required there all the time, but you could not conquer anything there. You could only die there. Just fight back, yes. Yes. Because in order to conquer something from the Crimeans, it was necessary to reach the Crimea, and we could not do this, because we, as a sedentary empire of that time, were very strongly tied to means of communication, and these were rivers. Those. We could fight with Kazan, with Astrakhan, with the Lithuanians simply because we could bring in heavy artillery and artillery outfits in general along rivers, and along some more or less acceptable roads, and it would help in field battles, and heavy artillery will help take the city, that’s how Polotsk was taken, for example, or how Kazan was taken. But it couldn’t be brought to the Crimeans, because if you go to the steppe, then you simply may not return from there. Food, water, diarrhea. Because what a march across the steppe looks like without points where you can concentrate food, ammunition, rest, recover, well, it just turned into a terrible horror even for regular armies. How Peter I went to the Prut and how it ended is the only serious defeat in general, and it almost turned into a disaster for the Russian army in the 18th century. We couldn’t cope with the Turks, and with the same Crimeans who were allowed there, even though they were a regular army. This is not a medieval army, it is controlled differently, equipped differently, supplied differently. Somehow I will again lay out the layout according to what the march of the Russian cavalry looked like. We talked about the Mongols a long time ago, now we need to talk about the Russians. So, we couldn’t bring the guns to the Crimea, so we could only fight off the Krymchaks, and it was generally clear to the Novgorodians what they needed, but for them it was without any profit, they wanted to fight with the Livonians, it’s not so dangerous. And the Crimeans, understanding all these nuances, organized a Crimean auction. This is an accepted term in historiography. Well, they sold themselves to the Lithuanians and attacked Moscow, or to the Muscovites and attacked the Lithuanians. Well done. Here. It is clear to us that we had our own people fed in Crimea. Like the Lithuanians, probably. Like, naturally, the Lithuanians, there was a diplomatic mission there on a permanent basis, and our well-wishers, such as Yamat-Murza, he directly wrote to the Grand Duke that I cannot defend your interests, because the Lithuanians literally shower the khan with gold and jewelry , wake, i.e. present. Are funerals gifts? Yes. He demanded regular wakes. And if you didn’t give him regular wakes, he would go to war against you. And Muhammad-Giray’s brother Sahib-Giray, for example, he did not hesitate to write to Vasily III that he demands to be his vassal, as we would say now, and to regularly pay him money, formulating it this way: if you don’t pay, I will come myself and I'll take a lot more. Those. It's better for you to pay. Indicated prices. Yes, yes, yes, because as much as I take, as much as I steal, I’ll take that much. So if you just pay, it will be cheaper. Be kind. Yes. Which, of course, Vasily III did not like in any case, but he couldn’t not pay, he couldn’t not pay all the time, because paying was actually cheaper, on the one hand; on the other hand, taking into account the Lithuanian factor, it was too expensive to pay the Crimeans constantly. But Vasily III died, in fact, what I’m leading all this to is Ivan IV, because where is Crimea, where is Livonia, now we will connect them. Vasily III died, Ivan IV came, he was the third grandson, a kalach in the kingdom and the husband of many wives. Here. Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible was his name, because he was a serious, respectable person. He’s not sweet in his ways and not lame in his mind, he’s the kind of person who has established order – even if he rolls a ball. He was still 15 years old, respectively, he was born in 1530, in 1545 the first campaign against Kazan, which under Vasily III was completely abandoned from us. It all ended with the bloody capture of 1552, after which it suddenly turned out that we were not only not friends of the Crimeans, but fierce enemies, because in 1556 we took Astrakhan, we closed the Volga, and the Crimeans had no enemies at all, except Russia. After this, it was no longer possible to put up with us. In addition, the Turks simply killed Devlet-Girey I’s predecessor when he began to pursue an overly independent policy. And Devlet-Giray was a cautious man, he, when he is presented as such a Hitler in a skullcap, who wanted to continuously fight with Russia, no, he would not have been against it theoretically, but he was a cautious man, a very, very smart and cautious man. But because he was careful, he understood that if he did not fight with Russia, the Turks would also do something to him, because they had all the opportunities and means of influence on Crimea, especially since it was their official vassal, Crimea, they were obliged obey. Well, of course, with reservations, like any vassal, he is a vassal only because he is obliged to the overlord to the same extent that the overlord is obliged to him. And this balance is maintained only in the sense that the overlord can be very strong, and yet you owe him a little more. Those. the partnership is unbalanced. And they began to push him towards war. On the one hand, the Lithuanians constantly paid him, they simply continuously showered him with gifts, just this Yamat-Murza wrote that I could not do anything. And Devlet-Girey wrote to Ivan the Terrible with approximately the same content as Sahib-Girey, that you will be my younger brother, i.e. vassal. Vanya... Yes, and it began... This, by the way, immediately coincides with the capture of Kazan, 1552. And a 25-year war with the Crimeans began, which ended only in 1577, only in 1577 did it end. And it was during this war that an organizational, military, and even psychological portrait of a Russian serviceman in general was formed, who was forced every year to stand up for the defense of his native borders, what is called disinterestedly, i.e. not having the desire to loot something, the desire and ability to loot something, on this very damn Oka. And all the military corporations throughout Russia were involved. Those. Novgorodians visited there, Kazan residents visited there, and, naturally, Muscovites visited there on a regular basis. In general, this shift service at the Oka border consumed monstrous resources, simply monstrous. It all ended with the fact that in 1571 Devlet-Giray actually burned Moscow to the ground, leaving only the Kremlin. The next year, in 1572, the bloody Battle of Molodi, which, in fact, decided the outcome of this war. Well, there it one way or another flared up, then died out on a small scale until the death of Devlet-Girai in 1577. He was a serious man. Yes. And now we need to compare this war and the situation in Livonia. We have never included such efforts in the Livonian direction as were involved in the Crimean direction, even approximately. And even when everything went wrong during the reign of Stefan Batory in 1580-83. Stefan Batory did not even dream of going to Moscow, he did not have such strength. And Devlet-Girey burned it. Therefore, the Livonian War was a secondary focus for Ivan the Terrible. It, in fact, did not end very well for us for one simple reason: we were busy with the Crimeans. We could not afford to throw decisive forces there. Yes, at some point large forces were involved there, but this is not the main direction. That is why it was a private failure, which could not lead to any damn Time of Troubles, it was just an episode. Which, yes, was expensive, but not too expensive. But what about Livonia, actually? Here we have Ivan IV sitting on the throne. Ivan IV needed constant supply of strategic resources for the war on the Volga, because, as we remember, 3 campaigns near Kazan, only the third was a success, and this was the most difficult situation. Plus, it was necessary to constantly bribe your people in the Podrayskaya land and feed the pro-Russian party in every possible way. Maintaining garrisons against Astrakhan and building cities required resources and specialists. And at this time Ivan IV, more precisely, he was still a young man then, i.e. Ivan IV and his company, they moved towards rapprochement with the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, and Charles V very actively moved towards rapprochement with Russia. Simply because Charles V fought with the Turks, and he needed any counterbalance to the Turks on his part. Well, literally just now, 1535, Charles personally leads an expedition to Tunisia, takes it, kicks out the Turks and mainly, of course, their local hangers-on, the famous pirate Hayraddin Barbarossa. It turns out that when the locals took Filyuki there in Tunisia, it turns out that they were selling guns to the French. The French named after The French are selling guns to the Turks because they were all branded with 3 fleurs-de-lis, i.e. hallmark of the French royal arsenal. Those. on the one hand, the French never supported the Turks, but everyone understood who was each other, because the Germans needed some kind of counterbalance to Turkey. It would seem that where is France, where is Russia, but the decision of the French and Francis I to help the Turks directly prompted Charles V to move closer to Russia. And he begins very active steps in this direction, remembering that his grandfather Maximilian I negotiated quite successfully with both Ivan III and Vasily III. The truth, of course, is not primarily against the Turks, but against the Poles. In general, this did not bring any significant results, but there were attempts and quite visible attempts, these moves by Germany towards Russia. And who reared up first? – Yes, the Livonian Order, because we had a requirement from Charles V to help with resources. And he was ready, because, Lord, there in this Germany they mine silver, and copper, and tin, and lead, and they have a lot of military specialists, and military specialists of the highest class, who have just literally gone through fire, water and copper trumpets of the Italian wars. Those. there were a lot of military people there who were ready right now to go somewhere and tell everyone how to do it for money. Veterans of hot spots. So there was not a hot spot there, these Italian wars were just a bloody meat grinder, tens of thousands of people went through it, having gained very serious experience and a complete reluctance to do anything else except war, because it was profitable. And a military specialist at that time was a person who could make not just a future for himself, but become some kind of great figure in history. For example, who would even know such nobles as, for example, the Frundsbergs. Yes, no one would know, except for some very sad heralds who generally pick around these same noble families, coats of arms and so on. But Georg Frundsberg became simply because he deftly commanded the Landsknechts, he became a world-class figure without fools, all of Europe literally knew him. Simply because he successfully commanded regiments of Landsknechts. And we were ready to host such adventurers with all our arms. To intensify this process, in 1548, a handsome young Saxon adventurer, Hans Schlitte, came to Charles V and offered to take over relations with Moscow. Apparently, he sat well on the ears of Charles V, because he gave him complete carte blanche, and he went to Moscow. In Moscow, he also caught the ears of Ivan IV, who, for his part, gave him complete carte blanche, and so Schlitte began to supply us, and he himself was from Saxony, specifically, he was born in a city where there were some of the best silver mines, those. he knew with whom he needed to quickly negotiate in order to supply precious metals directly. He recruited specialists, gathered strategic resources, and began to supply them to Ivan IV. And he was caught by the Livonians along with another portion of specialists. A monstrous scandal broke out, the Livonians had a row with Emperor Charles V, saying that this cannot be done, you understand that you are supplying Ivan IV with weapons and strategic resources, and we are already afraid of him. And this, of course, played a very important role, the Schlitte case played a very important role in the fact that Ivan the Terrible drew attention to Livonia, because the Livonians, this small dilapidated state, had the opportunity to simply turn off the valve for us. Which is unacceptable. Which is categorically unacceptable. And Ivan the Terrible first makes diplomatic efforts, and then military efforts, and it is here that an important caveat needs to be made. Ivan the Terrible did not consider Livonia his equal, he did not send sovereign envoys there, he negotiated with the Livonians only with the help of Novgorod officials. Some clerk is leaving Novgorod, negotiate with him. Because he considered Livonia to be just a principality. People need to be sent to the level. Yes. And he is an emperor, it’s impossible for him to communicate with the prince. Let the Novgorodians communicate there for 200 years and continue to communicate, but, of course, with an eye on the party line. And then he sends ambassadors from the sovereign. Things are reaching another level. The matter is reaching a completely different level, and the Livonians understand this immediately. Why are they just there with the Novgorodians, with their buddies, with whom they either fought or were friends, and then look, Adashev and Voskovaty arrived straight from Moscow. Famous names. Certainly. Who needed a reason to find fault with the Livonians. Because they have the right to pass any laws and issue any decrees on their territory - a sovereign state. Even if it’s unpleasant, what’s your business what’s pleasant or unpleasant to you? We need a reason, and there is a well-known reason - St. George’s tribute. Those. what the Livonians promised to pay for the possession of Dorpat, which they had taken away at one time and pledged to pay money for it. No one knows exactly when and how much they promised to pay. But for unknown reasons they didn’t pay, right? Yes. But for unknown reasons, they haven’t paid anything for 100 years. They came up with a sum, calculated interest on it, and in the end they ended up with a carload of silver, which had to be immediately given to Ivan IV. Well, immediately after Yuriev’s tribute, they rolled out a bunch of claims that merchants were being offended, by the way, who pay taxes to Moscow, peel off wax, and use merciless back-door treatment. What is this? I told you this once, when a barrel of wax just fell, for example, in Riga, you could take a sample from it, whether it was high-quality wax or not. The sample size was not specified. Those. you could just chop off half and not pay - I didn’t try it. Yes. Not rozibrav. Not rozibrav. Well, pay for the rest. The same thing happened with furs. It was possible to see if the fur was good, and then pick up a piece, and since... the size was not discussed... Cut off each skin. Yes. Because the size was not specified, it was terrible. Accordingly, we did not have the right to check with them whether, for example, they supplied us with wine, wine or, say, good Flemish cloth. They supplied it in barrels and pieces. Those. we could pay per piece and per barrel, but we could not verify the dimensions of the barrel and the piece. Great. Do you know where the word “enough” comes from in Russian? This is a very interesting linguistic incident. So-so. This is when you open a barrel, for example, with wine or beer, if you reach your finger, then it’s enough, and if not, then it’s not enough, you didn’t get it. Here. And, accordingly, they constantly tried to... deceive us. Deceive. To deceive, yes. And all these small territorial claims, connected primarily, of course, with claims to Narva, this is St. George’s tribute, the grievances of the merchants, they simply presented it all, and said that it must be paid, stopped, and Ivan IV rolled out an agreement, one of the main items of which were gold, silver, cloth, iron, and armor, i.e. except for armor. And the willing German people had a free path by water and mountain. Those. cloth and specialists were more expensive than armor. About armor, he said that if you want to supply it, supply it, if not, okay. And this completely coincides, by the way, with the list of von der Recke, who forbade the transport of this very thing. Those. Ivan IV knew exactly what he needed. We will make the shells ourselves somewhere, buy somewhere else, resources and specialists. But the Livonians are a confederation, they were in complete shock, on the one hand, on the other hand, of course, in complete happiness, because Yuryev’s tribute, so let this Yuryev, damn it, pay. Those. Dorpat. And everything else does not concern us. They were also smart, by the way. Here’s the wording: St. George’s tribute, so let the people of Dorpat pay it. The residents of Derpt said that we simply physically do not and cannot have that much money. Well, then Grozny decided that he was being deceived... Not without reason. Yes. What kind of antics are these? What kind of antics is this, yes. There, it means, they called the Livonian Landsgers, i.e. landlords were invited to Novgorod, where, as they say, a 200,000-strong Muscovite army was waiting for them at the border, so that they would be properly frightened. This, of course, is bullshit, there were maybe 2 thousand of them waiting there, that’s it. But it was also scary. But it was also unpleasant. And they fired cannons for a day while they agreed, so that it would also be scary. Look how much gunpowder we have, we can do this here! We agreed for 3 years to raise money. And at this time, the Lithuanians, Poles and Prussians tried to enter Livonia from the other side, namely, they decided to appoint a vicar, as we would say, or a coadjutor, as is correct, i.e. closest assistant, deputy of the Riga Archbishop Krzysztof (Christopher) of Macklenburg, who was a relative of the King of Poland Sigismund, in my opinion, a nephew, if I’m not mistaken. They decided to imprison him and through him influence the bishop of Riga and the master, respectively. But the master did not need this, and Master Furstenberg arrested him, realizing that he was a nit, a spy and a provocateur. After which the Prussians, just the former Teutons, Lithuanians and Poles, simply took and unobtrusively gathered about 15,000 troops there and placed them on the border with Livonia, after which Fürstenberg realized that either the water should be drained, or it was necessary to negotiate somehow, because He couldn’t resist them at all, he would have simply been crushed. And it is possible that he himself was hanged for the arrest of a relative of the king. And they conclude a very important agreement in the town of Pozvol, where the Livonians are led to an obligation of armed neutrality against Russia. What is characteristic is that our intelligence, apparently, completely missed this permission agreement; we simply did not know about it. Because Ivan the Terrible did not react at all for at least a year. And in Lithuanian letters, for example, internal correspondence, there are subtle mocking hints that Vanya doesn’t catch mice at all. We’ve already settled everything with Livonia, but he’s still waiting for some kind of tribute. But, naturally, it is impossible to hide such an awl in a sack of hay, because as soon as the Livonian ambassadors arrived again to negotiate with Ivan IV at the end of the three-year truce, it suddenly became clear that they were not going to pay him tribute, but asked him to think a little more, maybe there let's agree. After which, we don’t know for sure whether Ivan the Terrible found out about the Pozvolsky Treaty, but in fact he realized that they had agreed with someone else behind his back. And this was the last point, because he didn’t care at all about these petty squabbles of the Novgorodians, even about the fact that they don’t allow specialists and strategic goods to come to us there - after all, it was always possible to get around these problems, 200 years ago -they went around, or negotiate with the Swedes to take them through Sweden, it’s not so convenient, but it’s also possible. By the way, it was possible to buy iron from the Swedes, which is what we did. But then it became clear that Livonia was living out its last days on its own, and now all this would fall under the feet of Lithuania, and this could not be allowed under any circumstances. And then Ivan the Terrible takes such a step that the Livonians must understand that the jokes are over altogether; in 1557, a large army is formed on the border with Livonia, which consisted of Novgorod and Pskov horsemen and Kazan Tatars, who were promised that they could rob. And this autumn-winter of 1557 became the last peaceful day in general in Livonia, because since 1559 cannons thundered there and swords rang almost continuously. Because 1583, our very peace with Sweden, it did not mean absolutely nothing. Returning to the beginning of the conversation - the Livonian War is not the Livonian War, but the Livonian Wars. Because the Danes fought there with the Swedes and vice versa, Sweden with the Russians, Poland, Lithuania with Russia, Russia with Livonia, Poland and Lithuania. This is a series of very intense conflicts, this is the War of the Livonian Succession, that’s how we would say it correctly. Well, while everyone froze at the start, next time we’ll figure out what happened. Damn, it's picky. Somehow I don’t even know, every time I immerse myself... I repeat that I always imagine that now everyone is cunning, smart, intelligent, such an intricacy... They know everything. And here it’s no less cunning. And the most important thing is that for me, as a commoner, history is a set of some kind of anecdotes - someone sent someone to hell, took a woman away, and then there’s war. It turns out that it’s not about the woman or the message, but about completely different things. It's a mess, damn it. It’s a pity, there are no pictures of where who lives, who went where, who why. This is when we will talk about military operations. By the way, maybe I’ll even prepare some maps for this, for this conversation, at least so that people understand that Crimea is here, Moscow is here. And the state of Ukraine should be designated as ancient. Ancient, yes. There, really, in this state of Ukraine there will be stuck up to the tonsils the pole of the flag of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. That's it. Thank you, Klim Sanych. We look forward to the continuation. We are trying. That's all for today. Until next time.